Canton Coverup Part 392: Paul O’Keefe Files Lawsuit Against Canton Bars And Karen Read For Causing Emotional Distress After Raising Large Amounts Of Money After John O’Keefe’s Death

 

– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– Donate to the Turtleboy Legal defense fund
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group

Paul O’Keefe, Peggy O’Keefe, and Kaylee Furbush filed a wrongful lawsuit yesterday in Plymouth Superior Court against the Waterfall Bar, C.F. McCarthy’s, and Karen Read, for allegedly over serving Ms. Read leading to her allegedly running over John O’Keefe with her car and killing him.

searchresults (1)

Simple minded McAlbert mafioso are celebrating this as some sort of victory because they clearly have no idea how civil court works. However, this lawsuit can only help the Karen Read defense team and damage the McAlberts. Many of the things they allege in the lawsuit are easily proven to be untrue, according to witness testimony at Read’s trial and memorialized in police reports. The lawsuit claims that Read consumed 7 alcoholic beverages at CF McCarthy’s.

Nowhere in the surveillance video from CF McCarthy’s do you see her consume 7 drinks. She appears to order 3 shots which she drops into 3 different seltzers. At one point she buys a round of shots for John and his 2 friends, and she is clearly the only one who doesn’t take a shot. Watch this video from our friend Aussie Insider.

You don’t see her consume 7 drinks of anything, never mind 7 alcoholic beverages.

The lawsuit alleges that Karen read was showing signs of intoxication both at CF McCarthy’s and the Waterfall Bar.

Except that every single witness who commented on Read’s behavior at the bar testified that she did not appear to be drunk. Here are four of them, including Curt Roberts (CF McCarthy’s), the Waterfall bartender, Chris Albert (Waterfall), and Nicole Albert (Waterfall).

Paul O’Keefe’s civil suit against #KarenRead claims: “During all relevant times defendant Read showed signs of intoxication”

This claim was directly refuted by each witness questioned about this

4 examples (there’s more):Chris, Nicole, Curt, Rebecca (Note: all are CW witnesses) https://t.co/sV21ggwmrm pic.twitter.com/6qISqPaNRD

— *~The~Truth~Is~Always~The~Strongest~Argument~* (@RoJoe1968) August 26, 2024

Jen McCabe also told police multiple times that Karen didn’t appear to be drunk.

The people who had every reason to tell police that Karen Read DID appear to be drunk, because it would make it more believable that she killed John in a drunken rage, all chose to say that she DID NOT appear to be drunk. All of these “witnesses” will once again be called to testify, this time in depositions. This time they won’t have Adam Lally and Auntie Bev there to object to every question asked of them. They run the risk of giving testimony that conflicts with what they said under oath in the Read trial.

The last thing any of these people want to do is talk on the record, but now they’ll have to. They’ve been able to get away with what they’ve done for so long because they’ve had the support of John’s family, and convinced them that they had nothing to do with his death. But the problem is that they convinced the O’Keefe’s TOO well. They’re so convinced Karen did it that they’re willing to sue, which will force them all to risk their own legal liability by testifying once again.

The lawsuit says that Karen and John got into a fight the morning of January 29, leading to his intentional death.

There is zero evidence they were in a fight that night. John’s own text messages to Karen show that he asked her to drive them all because he was drinking. Their behavior on the CF McCarthy’s video shows them smiling, hugging, and laughing together. Witness statements all say that they appeared to be happy at the Waterfall and were NOT fighting.

So the Commonwealth and the O’Keefe’s want us to believe that during the 8 minute ride to Brian Albert’s house Karen and John immediately started screaming at each other which culminated with Read deciding to murder him outside of a Boston Police Officer’s house, and left his body in the last place her car was seen.

K.

The lawsuit goes on to say as a statement of fact that Karen Read hit John O’Keefe with her car.

Because Read still has ongoing criminal proceedings she can plead the fifth and stay this lawsuit. CF McCarthy’s and the Waterfall must respond within 20 days. Their insurance companies will want to pay the least amount of money possible to litigate this, and their first inclination will be to try to offer a settlement because it’s cheaper to pay grifters like the O’Keefe’s to go away than it is to pay billable hours for attorneys. If the O’Keefe’s don’t want to settle then the bars will ask for discovery and begin to depose “witnesses” who will all testify that Read didn’t appear to be drunk and wasn’t over served.

Most importantly, the bars now HAVE TO adopt and promote Read’s third party defense theory. If Karen killed John and she did so after being over served, the O’Keefe’s will win their lawsuit. So now a whole new team of attorneys with potentially unlimited budgets will be trying to prove that John wasn’t hit by a car. This means that they can depose the ARCCA experts who can say for the first time that they were hired by the FBI – something that jurors weren’t aware of and directly influenced the split vote on manslaughter charges.

The lawsuit claims that Karen woke up 14 year old Kaylee Furbush and told her that she hit John with her car.

Except in the charging documents it doesn’t mention ANYTHING about this.

Wouldn’t the police mention the most incriminating thing Karen Read allegedly told Kaylee in the charging documents?

The lawsuit alleges that Read “feigned” comfort when she returned to John’s house that morning, “removed the murder weapon,” and “destroyed relevant evidence.”

1. Their belief that Karen Read was faking grief and comfort is subjective and not proof of anything. Paul is admittedly biased and says that he “knew” as a matter of fact that Read killed his brother before he ever even spoke with police. His opinion on the authenticity of Read’s grief is as biased as you can get and has no legal bearing.
2. If the car was the murder weapon the police wouldn’t have let her drive away with it at 12:30 PM.
3. The complete lie that Read “destroyed relevant evidence” by logging onto John’s computer and deleting Ring camera footage from that morning was proven to be a fabrication during the trial when both Yuri Bukhenik and Michael Proctor testified that they contacted Ring and found this to be untrue. Additionally, both children testified that Read did not have access to John’s computer or Ring.

Most outrageously, the O’Keefe’s are suing Read for using a third party culprit defense, because they have baselessly deemed that it’s a “fabricated conspiracy” and Read caused them “frustration” by defending herself.

Now Paul is experiencing aggravated emotional distress.

I’m also feeling aggravated emotional distress from last month when Paul sent me a threatening message, vowing to put me in jail.

Then there’s the emotional distress Paul caused me by seeking out and inviting a recovering heroin addict to his brother’s pre-trail murder hearing, who lied to have me put in jail for 60 days.

Paul felt so much emotional distress on September 15, 2023, that he yelled “fuck you asshole” at Karen Read’s brother on his way into court.

Then there was all the emotional distress he experienced smiling and starting down Karen Read in court, bringing his goon Karl Dugal to assault Read inside the courthouse, and threatening Read on the way out after the mistrial.

In fact, he’s so distressed that he’s not sure what to do with the $336K he raised using his niece, nephew, and dead brother.

Karen Read opened a trust fund for those children to make sure they were financially sound. Is there an accounting of where the money Paul received went to? Or are we not allowed to ask that? Are we allowed to ask about the fact that Paul took out $230k from a bank where his mother in law Kris Resendes is a member of the board of directors?

Bridgewater Savings Bank became Bluestone Bank in 2020, but Kris hasn’t updated her LinkedIn. She’s still friendly with people there though.

Can we mention the fact that Paul paid that large amount of money back in less than 2 months without refinancing his original mortgage?

Can we mention that this was right around the time when an excavator was seen on his property adding an addition to his West Bridgewater house?

Paul’s neighbors sent us the picture with the excavator on October 6, 2023, but I didn’t publish them because I wasn’t convinced her was grifting at the time. Now it’s clear that he’s using his brother’s death for another pay day. The neighbor reached out again after hearing about the lawsuit:

“His garage door is open all the time. He has a golf cart in there. Like your neighbors are as sick of seeing your garage as they were of seeing your crotch.”

In the civil suit Paul says that he was SO upset and grief stricken by Karen Read’s third party culprit defense. But not grief stricken enough to prevent him from doing a total home renovation which would have contractors coming in and out of his house for months, with his home in total disorder.

But we’re not allowed to talk about that, and you’re definitely not allowed to ask where any of this money was coming from.

And we are DEFINITELY not allowed to talk about the irony of Paul O’Keefe getting arrested for driving drunk during the middle of the day on October 11, 2020, and badly injuring a 72 year old man named Carl Prather in Lakeville.

search.page (40)

And you absolutely can NOT bring up the fact that Paul admitted to drinking and driving, failed multiple sobriety tests, and refused to take a breathalyzer.

It’s OK when Paul gets shitfaced and hits elderly people because he’s friends with the McAlberts. But when Karen Read drives after consuming three drinks it is immediately assumed that she killed a Boston cop outside the home of another Boston cop, and if you say otherwise you’re causing Paul O’Grift emotional distress.