TB Investigates

Canton Coverup Part 398: Tara Kerrigan Steals Spotlight In Karen Read 20/20 Special By Displaying Obsession With John O’Keefe For The World To See  

 

Donate to the Turtleboy Legal defense fund

– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group

A lot of Free Karen Read supporters are not happy happy with 20/20’s two hour show on the Karen Read/John O’Keefe murder trial. Their biggest concerns are that they didn’t mention a whole bunch of really important information, and didn’t combat the lies that were told by the McAlbert Mafia. These included:

  • Mentioning the broken tail light but NOT showing video of Karen backing into John’s car
  • Lucky Loughran and the Ford Edge
  • Any real depth about the federal investigation
  • Inverted video from Canton Police garage
  • John’s phone going up and down 3 flights of stairs
  • Testimony from the ARCCA experts making it clear John wasn’t hit by a car
  • Dog bite expert testimony
  • Any mention of the Sandra Birchmore case and crossover between the two murders
  • Canton voting to audit Police Department
  • Video from when Jim Farris and the Galvin’s threatened a 20/20 producer

There’s a lot more they didn’t get to, but overall I still liked it because:

  • No one from the State Police or the McAlbert clan, including Proctor, Bukhenik, Tully, Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Brian Higgins, or Adam Lally, appeared in the show. The lead detective and someone from the DA’s Office are ALWAYS featured prominently on 20/20 and Dateline
  • No sign of Peggy or Paul O’Keefe. In a normal murder trial the mother of the murder victim is the center of attention and demands justice for their child. Peggy O’Keefe hasn’t said a single nice thing about her son since he was killed.
  • This will garner new attention for the case, which will bring eyeballs to Turtleboy, which will lead people down the rabbit hole to learn the real facts of the case
  • Karen Read was humanized when she shed genuine tears talking about Patrick Furbush and her mother
  • Karen Read got to explain why she left 1 Meadows Ave that morning in a way that made perfect sense

The people claiming to be John O’Keefe’s closest friends and family made absolute fools of themselves, including Brendan Kane and John Jackson. They claim to be John’s closest friends, yet Brian Albert and Colin Albert, who didn’t attend John’s funeral, were invited to closing statements over them. Jackson called it a “disgusting move” to show John’s injuries in court, because people like him would prefer if the world didn’t see what the McAlbert’s did to John. Once you see the autopsy photos it becomes blatantly obvious that he wasn’t hit by a car.

My biggest gripe with the show was how 20/20 allowed blatant lies about protesters booing the O’Keefe family to be aired by John’s so-called friends. On July 25, 2023, I held the first protest outside of Norfolk Superior Court before Read’s pre-trial hearing. We booed Yuri Bukhenik and Brian Tully because they helped orchestrate the coverup of John O’Keefe’s murder. We booed other McAlbert supporters who wore their “Justice for JJ” Walmart buttons. But when Paul and Peggy O’Keefe arrived most people didn’t know what they looked like. In order to prevent people from booing them I informed the crowd who they were and ordered people NOT to boo them. It was all caught on video:

And that is what responsible leadership looks like. Since then I have changed my mind on the O’Keefes and no longer feel bad for them. They are enabling the people who murdered John, and have encouraged ratchets like Krusty Panties, Fake Victim, Twisted Tragedies, and Tony Fed to show up and make a mockery of John’s death by playing AI songs about balloon knots and starting fights with peaceful supporters of Karen Read and John O’Keefe.

But the biggest loser in the entire episode was this single white female:

Tara Kerrigan dated John 20 years ago before they broke up, and she is quite clearly still obsessed with him. She wrote this op-ed in Boston Magazine last April before the trial started, and this was the cover photo:

No, this is not John O’Keefe’s wife. It’s just a 50 year old woman wearing a custom made necklace with his badge number, holding a picture of him like he’s lost at sea. She also runs an Instagram account, which consists solely of pictures of them 20 years ago.

Tara claims to be close friends with John, but Karen Read never met her during their 2 year relationship, and I think we all know why. She also doesn’t seem to have ANY pictures of them together past 2003, which appears to be the year she is perpetually live in.

On the day of the mistrial she made a post on IG declaring Karen Read’s guilt because Read hugged her parents after the mistrial was declared, which apparently is not a thing innocent people do.

Who needs physics and evidence when you can decide someone’s guilt or innocence based purely on emotion and slogans.

Tara’s marriage to photographer Terrence Hayes didn’t work out, likely because he eventually figured out that she was in love with another man. As you can imagine, she appears to be a pain in the ass and filed a motion for contempt (that was denied) because her ex-husband wanted to bring their kid to New Orleans a year and a half after the COVID outbreak, which she wouldn’t allow because Louisiana was “on the rise with COVID cases.”

Tara claims to be best friends with John, yet she didn’t list him as one of the 7 adults who was allowed to watch her son, despite the fact that he was a cop in the same city in which she lived.

 

The Boston Magazine article is oozing with pure cringe.

My phone was still on silent when I woke the morning of January 30, 2022, to four missed calls and a text from a friend that read, “Call me when you get up. I think something happened to John.” I dialed her number. “John who?” I asked as soon as she answered. “Your John. John O’Keefe,” she said, explaining that she had seen a tribute to John on Facebook that indicated he had passed away.

So she was so close to John that she didn’t even find out he was dead on the day that he died. She had to hear about it through a friend the next day, and Tara’s friend referred to him as “your John,” as if they’re still together.

While technically my ex-boyfriend, John was so much more than that. We met in 2001 and had a big love that evolved into a friendship spanning more than 20 years. We had seen each other through some hard times. We had a special connection.

He wasn’t “technically” your ex-boyfriend – he was in fact your ex-boyfriend. From more than 20 years ago. This isn’t normal behavior Tara. Please seek help.

It got worse:

I immediately hung up and called John’s cell—I knew he would answer, explain the mix-up, and we’d laugh about it. At least, that’s what I told myself. But John didn’t answer; instead, the phone went straight to voicemail. I tried him again. Voicemail.

These people simply cannot stop making John O’Keefe’s death all about them. They are grief whores, and none of them want actual justice for him. They just want to be seen in court so people can feel bad for them while they shoot death glares at the woman they’d realize was innocent if they bothered to actually research the evidence in John’s case.

What John’s family considered to be an open-and-shut case, though, was about to become anything but. In September 2022, Los Angeles–based criminal defense attorney Alan Jackson, who defended Kevin Spacey and Harvey Weinstein in sexual assault cases and is known for his flair in the courtroom, joined Read’s legal team. I sat with John’s family and friends in disbelief as Jackson transformed hearings into what felt like the set of a Hollywood whodunit, arguing that Read was framed. He told of extravagant theories that I and John’s family believe directly contradicted the facts of the case.

And therein lies why they hate Karen Read – she was supposed to just roll over and die. It was an “open and shut case” filled with mysterious butt dials, incriminating Google searches, and experts who insist that John wasn’t hit by a car. It’s just that simple – Karen Read did it. And people like Tara put their fingers in their ears and yelled “Harvey Weinstein” like facts would no longer be facts if they pretended they didn’t exist.

I once asked Paul how he managed to show such remarkable restraint while under attack by Read supporters. “They’re misinformed. Misguided. So I just don’t engage,” he told me.

Right, Paul never engages. Except when he yells “fuck you asshole” at Karen’s brother on his way into court:

Tara went on to cry about how we escorted her, Karl and Jackie Dugal to their car on September 15.

Just to clarify, Karl harassed Karen during a press conference on May 24 and wouldn’t answer my questions after he did so (5:10).

Karl is not some innocent bystander. He was banned from the Karen Read trial because he assaulted her in the hallway during the first week of witnesses. He ran his big mouth, and then when someone ran it back to him he was suddenly the victim.

The bottom line is that no jury will ever convict Karen Read, no matter how much low information losers like Tara Kerrigan, John Jackson, Brendan Kane, Karl Dugal, and the Rizzetano’s want her to go to jail. So it doesn’t matter if 20/20 didn’t tell all the facts of the case, because the jury in trial 2 will hear them all, and this time they’ll get it right.

 

 

Hello Turtle Riders. As you know if you follow Turtleboy we are constantly getting censored and banned by Facebook for what are clearly not violations of their terms of service. Twitter has done the same, and trolls mass reported our blog to Google AdSense thousands of times, leading to demonetization. We can get by and survive, but we could really use your help. Please consider donating by hitting the Donation button above if you'd like support free speech and what we do in the face of Silicon Valley censorship. Or just buy our award winning book about the dangers of censorship and rise of Turtleboy:  Qries

26 Comments

  1. Will proctor wear his brown pants to the trial?
    I hope fatty matty makes an appearance again.
    I hope he’s breast feeding his horse okay. She looks like the cryptkeeper.

  2. I read that article in Boston Ragozine. Anyone who thinks Lally was doing a great job cannot be taken seriously. Lally took up WEEKS of this trial by first doing a Canton rehabilitation tour to bolster Jen, Brian, and all the other thugs. Weeks spent trying to shield and protect their reputation instead of calling forensic witnesses or EMTs first. What kind of lawyer for the State does that? Answer: One who’s playing rope-a-dope, with his endless objections and lack of any hardcore facts to prove his case.

  3. She must be related to Nancy Kerrigan ? Both have that “How dare you question my Intelligence look”
    But I would still Bang Bang them both.

    1. I’d be careful with this one, she’s got the crazy 1000 cock stare.

      Plus I bet that bad tit job looks like 2 hard as a rock misshapen grapefruit halves when the shirt comes off.

  4. …………………Hi TB,

    ……I watched your live follow up to the 20/20 show, and my 2 criticisms ” I have is— the constant pro***ity about this woman “can’t f*ck John anymore”, and the only other one is the one above in that you lost respect for JO’K’eefes mom and dad.

    To put it in perspective,when I was in my twenties, I always had something to say about people I thought were pulling some kind of scam job; or basic stuff like double parking,using food stamps , and so on: – It took a couple of backhanders from my MOM to for me to STFU ,” before I end up in jail”…………

    Incidentally, I think we all know that JO’Keefes mom and dad know damn well this is a coverup, but they cannot come to terms with it at the moment (remember they cannot go to the Canton “cops”).

    Let’s hope that PUNK Colin Albert (see what I did there) blabs at a party or something, and somebody gets it down on their cellphone,—-somebody will break!!!

    EXCELLENT WEBSITE!!!……………+much needed!!!

  5. Hello Neat post Theres an issue together with your site in internet explorer would check this IE still is the marketplace chief and a large element of other folks will leave out your magnificent writing due to this problem

  6. I do believe all the ideas youve presented for your post They are really convincing and will certainly work Nonetheless the posts are too short for novices May just you please lengthen them a little from subsequent time Thanks for the post

  7. She looks like one of those Covid freaks . You know ,the only one wearing a masks on Saturday morning. Walking the aisles. With I’m smarter than you look.

      1. As a chick, these suburban, “educated”, white, liberal pronouns have turned me into a misogynist.
        Please put them back in the mask – saves the rest of us time to find out who to avoid eye contact with. Shallow emotional hypocrites – all of them.

    1. it wasn’t only women! yet usually college educated who mistakenly think they are wicked smart and or the ones making min wage without any managerial skills or opportunities who were exploited yet felt so important! sad…any store that employed those types at the door to do their dirty work, I’d walk right past as they looked defeated!! usually I’m kinder and treat everyone the same, just do not ever get in my face telling me what to do….legalize freedom…

  8. Reasons you liked the 20/20 have nothing to do with Karen Read trying to prove her innocence and stay out of jail. It’s is “bring eyeballs to Turtleboy” as you stated.

    What a narcissist cunt you are.

    1. He’s been reporting on this case for a long time alot of people want his opinion and all the other YouTubers following this case have been doing the exact same thing in their video about this 20/20 episode. Anything TB does that includes Karen Reed is always a good thing because it’s promoting her name and case for others who don’t know and it also keeps the fire in the public’s stomachs to keep fighting the corruption and protesting for her. Plus a lot of idiot people are posting about this 20/20 episode negatively, so it’s good that there are positive opinions on the piece out there for people who are strangers to the case.

      Don’t be such a wanker, what are you doing to help Karen?

    2. If “new eye balls” go to the tb website they will read and watch the content where the actual evidence proves that Karen did not hit John with her car….

  9. I have a few questions:

    1) Do you still believe Derek Chauvin is guilty? You have consistently said he is a bad man and you don’t support him regardless of the evidence (we call this a contradiction).

    2) Do you realize that MLK was a rapist, serial adulterer, plagiarized his graduate and undergraduate work, fathered a child out of wedlock, didn’t marry a white woman because his father was against it, didn’t write a majority of his speeches and wanted white people to pay reparations and abide by affirmative action?

    I’m only asking in the interest of truth. You WERE a history teacher after all.

      1. @FuckJoeFriday –

        Thanks for not wasting our time. You could have simply pointed out where I was wrong. You know, like an adult.

        Instead it appears you spared yourself the embarrassment of revealing how stupid you are.

    1. 1) Do you still believe Derek Chauvin is guilty? You have consistently said he is a bad man and you don’t support him regardless of the evidence (we call this a contradiction).

      Chauvin a political prisoner of the mad dog left, and that creep of a whiny little man AG Merick Garland. He was doing what he’s trained to do.

      2.Do you realize that MLK was a rapist, serial adulterer, plagiarized his graduate and undergraduate work, fathered a child out of wedlock, didn’t marry a white woman because his father was against it, didn’t write a majority of his speeches and wanted white people to pay reparations and abide by affirmative action?

      This I agree with

  10. Thanks I have just been looking for information about this subject for a long time and yours is the best Ive discovered till now However what in regards to the bottom line Are you certain in regards to the supply

  11. This chick is looking to star in the remake of “Fatal Attraction”, but instead of boiling the rabbit, she’ll be boiling Karen Read in the pot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *