TB Investigates

Canton Cover-Up Part 156: Commonwealth Says Michael Proctor Made “Mistake” By Putting Wrong Times In Police Reports, Claims Karen Read Never Did 3 Point Turn In Absurd New Theory

 

– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– Donate to the Karen Read Legal Defense Fund
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group

Karen Read’s attorneys have appealed Judge Cannone’s denial of a Rule 17 motion to give them access to Brian Albert’s cell phone records from 12-6 AM on January 29, 2022, and it will be heard within a month or two in the Supreme Judicial Court. The Commonwealth has responded with a 188 page opposition filled with more lies

The Commonwealth is now admitting for the first time that Michael Proctor’s report contains an error about what time he arrived at Karen Read’s parent’s home in Dighton at 5:30. They claim this was an unintentional mistake, “clearly rectified by other evidence including Dighton Police reports that were authored on January 29, 2022.”

Except there’s several problems with that:

  1. The mistake they’re correcting contains another mistake – Proctor didn’t say he arrived at 5:30, he said he arrived at 4:30 and left at 5:30.

2. This “unintentional mistake” was presented as evidence to the grand jury to charge Karen Read with murder. The SERT team search where the tail light was discovered took place 15 minutes later at 5:45, which wouldn’t give Proctor enough time to drive to Canton and plant evidence. If the grand jury knew that Proctor had left much earlier it would open up the possibility in their eyes that he could have planted it before 5:45.

3. If this was an unintentional mistake then why did the Commonwealth repeatedly double down in court filings, claiming that Proctor arrived in Dighton at 4:30, and left at 5:30? Adam Lally repeatedly threw out the absurd theory that the Read’s Alarm.com footage showing the car being towed at 4:12 was the result of not setting the clocks back for daylight savings. Why would he do this if he thought 5:30 was a mistake?

 

 

4. The Commonwealth is admitting that they knew a police report existed with the Dighton Police Department, showing that the scene was cleared by 4:17 PM. Yet they didn’t bother getting it until we filed a public records request for it the report. At that point it was undeniable that Proctor was lying, and Lally was covering for him. Now they’re saying it was all just a big mistake that they’ve been repeating in curt for the last 20 months.

The Commonwealth is also blatantly lying that they never agreed to have an evidentiary hearing. Instead Lally claims that his “tone was difficult to decipher” in emails.

In an April 14 email discussing the upcoming evidentiary hearing that Lally had already agreed upon, Lally stated he would be “looking to call witnesses of my own” if there was a dispute issue, and that the defense could call whatever witnesses they want.

His “tone” was perfectly clear – he planned on calling witnesses for an evidentiary hearing.

Additionally, the Commonwealth is now claiming that the 3 point turn never happened. Instead they are saying, without providing any evidence, that Karen Read accelerated from 0-24 mph (in reverse, in the snow) in 62 feet, striking John O’Keeefe. She then continued to go in reverse after hitting him, which would indicate that she ran him over. They’re also continuing to claim that the “hair” they tested from Karen’s car was human hair, even though a DNA test last month proved that it wasn’t.

This means that:

  • Karen was at least 62 feet from where John’s body was found before she decided to gun it in reverse. This would mean she was sitting outside of the driveway of 32 Fairview Road, something no witness claims to have seen.
  • John chose to remain in the road, while his allegedly furious and murderous girlfriend drover forward 62 foot, and then remained in place in the road in order to allow Karen Read to run him over.
  • Going 24 mph in reverse in the snow is terrifyingly fast, and accelerating that quickly in order to achieve that speed over such a short distance would be extremely loud. Yet no one in the house heard a thing, nor did any neighbors. Brian and Nicole Albert said that they heard no loud noises. Five other witnesses inside the house were not interviewed by police, and thus could not contradict this statement.

  • The Ring camera at 31 Fairview, the home of Deputy Police Chief Tom Keleher, would’ve certainly picked up Karen Read’s vehicle since it was directly across the street.
  • Karen chose not to drop John off in the driveway, but rather dropped him off in the corner of the house so he could walk diagonally across the lawn.
  • This conflicts with Ryan Nagel’s statement that he didn’t see John inside or outside the car, and didn’t see damage to the back of the vehicle.
  • John’s body would’ve gotten crushed by the car when she ran him over, and the rear of Karen’s vehicle would have significant damage. Yet there is no damage to the car, and no bruises or broken bones on John’s body below his body.
  • Jen McCabe claimed that she saw Karen drive away at 12:45. According to the Commonwealth’s new theory this means that she saw Karen leave IMMEDIATELY after hitting John O’Keefe, which means McCabe would’ve been looking out the window and have seen her strike him.

  • If Karen did not strike John O’Keefe until 12:45 then that means Ryan Nagel was lying when he said that Karen was alone in her car when he left the house at 12:30.
  • The Commonwealth has officially given up on the death by three point turn theory, despite the fact that Matt McCabe told Michael Proctor that he saw v-shaped tire tracks consistent with making a three point turn, and despite the fact that they used the three point turn theory to charge her with murder in the first place. Fairview Road is less than 62 feet wide, which would make it impossible for Karen Read to travel 62 feet before striking JO.

  • Karen Read couldn’t figure out how to back out of her driveway at 5 AM without hitting John O’Keefe’s Chevy Traverse, but she was able to successfully hit him in a snow storm while reversing at 24 mph.

They’re making up all of these ridiculous lies in order to prevent the defense from accessing Brian Albert’s cell phone records from a time when he was allegedly sleeping. That’s how you know something VERY damning is on there.

The botom line is that they think you’re very, very stupid. These people have no problem lying to the public, despite the fact that we can all clearly see they aren’t telling the truth. They will do anything to lynch Karen Read, but we will not let them.

 

Hello Turtle Riders. As you know if you follow Turtleboy we are constantly getting censored and banned by Facebook for what are clearly not violations of their terms of service. Twitter has done the same, and trolls mass reported our blog to Google AdSense thousands of times, leading to demonetization. We can get by and survive, but we could really use your help. Please consider donating by hitting the Donation button above if you'd like support free speech and what we do in the face of Silicon Valley censorship. Or just buy our award winning book about the dangers of censorship and rise of Turtleboy:  Qries

61 Comments

  1. un-effing-believable! The lies and story changes are constant. With each piece of evidence that is challenged by the defense they just make up a new story. I attempted to drive out of my driveway in reverse (long driveway) as fast as I could…I could never get over 10-12 MPH but felt like i was going much faster and was about to crash. Its difficult to control an SUV in reverse. There is no way that SUV was going that fast. Another lie, another story.

    1. Do we know if the Commonwealth is claiming Karen’s Lexus was in AWD or 4WD when reversing? With my 2020 SUV, I have to manually engage to 4WD – selecting either 4H or 4L based on conditions and traction. Curious what gear they are claiming Karen was in, because it makes a big difference

    1. Although, how did he see v-shaped tire marks consistent with a three point turn if he wasn’t at the scene? The lies are so blatantly bad they conflict themselves!

  2. I really really wish the FBI handcuffs him an Proctor in the middle of another trial. It would be great to have Proctologist coming off the stand an gets cuffed an Lallyballgagger right afterwards. Hope its in Beverly concocted Concanman court room an read why they are getting arrested. That would make this worth it.

  3. The published 0 to 60 mph time for Karen’s vehicle is around 10 seconds. That’s brand new, under ideal conditions on a racetrack. That means it takes at LEAST 4 seconds to reach 24 mph. In 4 seconds that vehicle will travel at least 140 ft – more than twice the distance the prosecution is claiming og 60+ ft. Next they’ll be saying she was driving a Porsche to make their math work.

    In court they claimed they had not yet been able to access the Lexus data and here, 2-days earlier, they claim they have.

    Everything I can find about vehicle data recorders (aka Black Boxes) say they store a few seconds to a few minutes worth of data. It’s not a running infinite log. Karen drove that car home and back, then around Canton looking for John and then finally to her parents home. It’s hard to imagine ANY data from the accident would still be in the limited stored “Black Box” memory. Maybe a Lexus tech can weigh in.

    It looks like the Prosecution is willing to say and do anything to keep his cell phone from the defense.

    1. EDR’s typically store 5 “events” at a time. Anything that causes a change in velocity (“Delta V”) above a certain threshold. When a new “event” happens, the oldest “event” gets overwritten. The car could sit at the MSP barracks for years and the last 5 events will still be stored and available for extraction.

      Unfortunately a pedestrian strike usually doesn’t result in a “Delta V” high enough to be considered an “event”. On the bright side, the Toyota/Lexus safety system is far more sophisticated than other manufacturers’. KR’s infotainment system is gonna be the jackpot here, not the EDR. The process for extracting this information is MUCH more intrusive than the process for extracting EDR data.

  4. If there was no body at 2:30 am then how about there was no body at all. With this many changes to the narrative that is not an unreasonable assumption.

  5. Besides the obvious that it blows their case apart. What standing do they have to challenge going after Brian Albert’s phone? They are trying to convict Karen. What does Brian Albert’s phone have anything to do with her hitting John with a car? Nothing. The commonwealth should have no legal standing to try to protect an unrelated party from having to turn their phone over. According to the commonwealth Brian was asleep or at a party anyways. If their theory is correct it has nothing to do with them or their theory so they should have no reason to oppose this motion.

    1. Because by their whacky ass theories he was not involved or aware or anything. Which is bullshit. But if he was not involved in any way seizing his phone could be considered a “fishing expedition” and violate his rights against illegal search and seizure. Which, let me be clear, I am on our side here and 100% feel as we all do. They did it. Karen Read is innocent. But this is a way they can justify opposing it. I think anyway….

  6. It is terrifying that the MSP can make these “mistakes” and just shrug their shoulders and say ooops and not be held accountable! It’s one of two things, Proctor is a really really bad detective and didn’t care about finding out what happened to a Boston Police officer. Or he is corrupt!
    The investigation at this point is so fucked up, it will be a miracle if they ever find out who killed John . But once Karen’s charges are dropped or she is found not guilty I hope we continue to push for justice for John O’Keefe because his family certainly won’t!

    1. That many mistakes can’t just be a bad day at work.
      He is extremely corrupt.
      Remember, they are still sticking to the story that the proctors and alberts don’t know each other.
      Even though Colin was in a wedding with Micheal Proctor and Proctors mother calls them her second family.

  7. Three things stuck from this:

    1) Try accelerating to 24 MPH in reverse in your car. Now try doing it in 62 feet. In snow.
    Big difference! But wait, she’s drunk, right?? That’s what they say!! Bullshit.

    2) So Jen McCabe DOESN’T see a vehicle traveling in reverse at 24 mph, OR hear the impact, OR John’s wailing, OR see him writhing in the snow. BUT RIGHT AT THAT MOMENT she happens to look out the window to see Karen driving away. But again, SHE DOESN’T SEE JOHN.

    3) If they have Karen’s phone (Obviously they have it says Lally), they know exactly when Karen Read left that location and exactly when she arrived back at John’s house to go to sleep. (And they have the camera from John’s house as well). I’m betting Karen left that house some time shortly after 12:30 – her boyfriend having just gotten a basement beatdown….and she had no idea.

  8. This entire case is insane. Next, I’m waiting for: “The scrapes on his arm were caused by the tires of the Lexus SUV”.

    The number of people involved in this coverup indicates to me that true justice will never be served. Maybe Karen won’t be convicted, but I don’t believe anyone else will be either.

      1. That is unfortunately what will happen. And then in a few years we will hear that Colin Albert murdered someone else. 😤

    1. I agree. Sadly. Karen will of course be acquitted but no one else will be convicted. Which was the Commonwealth’s goal all along.

    2. Lol!!! I really did see that as a comment somewhere!
      Must have been YCT!
      The person commented that the arm injuries were from being underneath the car.

  9. One more thing…any evidence under the car? If she ran him over (the car continued in reverse after striking him they say), there would be his DNA underneath that vehicle, and on the curb, and on the road.

  10. Maybe the hair is in fact turtle hair after all…bite marks on the arm look consistent with turtle bites 🐢

  11. Ok so Karen drunkly backs up straight for 62 feet, reaches 24 mph and slams into John. A single taillight shatters, John crushes his skull on pavement which incapacitates him and Karen drives off….now how exactly does he make it to the lawn? A plow picks up a 200lb man from his arm, in 2 inches in snow, and throws him to the lawn?

    It really takes a nitwit to come up with that ridiculous rationale, but not unexpected from my mom meatball Morrisey and his dominatrix Sally Lally

    1. The troopers keep say in their report that the tail light is shattered followed by say a piece is missing. Shattered means it’s in tiny pieces. If the piece missing isn’t there, how do they know it’s shattered and not just 1 big piece… Unless they knew about the fairy dusting of tail lights by Proctor and friends.

  12. Can’t someone look at the Canton Public Library footage from that early morning and see if that Ford Edge drives by around 3pm (as it would per the quickest route from Chris/Colin Alberts house).

  13. I’d it is true an she didn’t do a 3 Pont turn. Why aren’t her charges being upgraded. I mean pulling 60′ forward an in a fit of rage goes in reverse at 24mph is premeditated murder. Given the circumstances from the Da he would have if he really thought she did that.

  14. Karen Read I am so so sorry at first I thought there is no way you could ever be charged , I still can’t believe it, but now I want to be in that court room in March when your Attorney’s destroys them on the stand. They know you didn’t do it

  15. So, recording the wrong time on that report was “just an accident”… no mention of all the wrongly spelled names in the previous report, though. I swear they are just making this up as they go along. Even Judge Judy would destroy them. Bunch of🤡🤡🤡🤡, the whole lot.

  16. why is the commonwealth protecting these scum buckets? The “opine” of the reconstruction expert doesn’t line up with the EYE witness…for christ sake. This state of Mass is a f*cking toilet

    1. I feel like proctor protected his second family and the state is specifically protecting just proctor. He’s been involved in a lot of cases all of which are in jeopardy if it gets proven how corrupt he is.

  17. File this under just saying…gotta throw some common sense into the data. If your in an all wheel drive suv and you step on the gas in the SNOW it’s very easy to get the wheels spinning and the cars computer measuring 24 mph even though the suv is only moving 7 or 9 mph…ok back to trying to figure out what happened.

    .

    1. Variables are:
      Traction control on: the car will bog down as soon as the wheels spin and it can’t get going an actual 24 mph in two inches of snow, no way.

      Mph: is it the speedometer reading or is it measured with GPS these days?
      All in all though, hitting him with the car spur of the moment without him yelling or someone seeing or hearing it is way more difficult that kicking his ass and dragging him out a couple hours later.

      1. Curious as well. AWD vs 4WD – 4H vs 4L.. so curious what gear they are claiming the Lexus was in. I’m not familiar with Lexus SUVs but curious if the 4WD is automatically engaged.. in my 2020 SUV, I have to manually engage it – selecting 4H or 4L

  18. Hey, good job on FINALLY redacting Karen Read’s personal info from the Dighton Police Log. She definitely does not need identity theft added to her list of troubles. But, the OLN listed after race and sex is her MA license number and should be redacted as well. Keep up the great work!

    1. Her S#? What is someone doing with that – picking up a prescription? That is all that # is used for as far as I know…

    2. Wow, good for you?
      Who gives a shit?
      Maybe a proctor/dugle/McCabe/ or a krusty.
      One homely, arrogant, bunch of humans.

  19. Why does the prosecution even care about why the defense wants Brian Albert’s phone records etc.? In reality has nothing to do with their supposed case against Karen Reed? This is about the defense’s issue with a judge ruling doesn’t even have anything to do with them at all ???? I mean is BA getting free legal services ? They’re protecting him more than finding justice for John ??? Won’t they look so ridiculous filing a 188 page report to “explain” the judges ruling ? Excuse me ??? And now in they’ve taken the time to continuously change previous reports & cover up poor police investigating & report taking, and know darn well we the public are seeing in live time what they are doing ??? And they could care less … well who the hell do they have to answer too ???? This is so unjust it isn’t even funny !!! Nothing the report further would EVER BE TRUSTED how could it be ??? It’s been a clown investigation full of tricks & “misspelled ” witnesses & ” accident” time reporting errors…. well God if you don’t take the further responsibility of a detective or police officer, to make darn sure EVERYTHING especially names, times, & locations are absolutely correct ….. well then you shouldn’t hold or deserve those positions!!!! It’s not that friggin hard to get those facts right !!!! And I’m sure this superior judge is thoroughly looking forward to reading their ridiculous 188 page report they sent in for no good reason…. has nothing to do with them !! I can’t even believe that would be allowed in a sense …. this is getting so repulsive & they’re laughing at all of us .. because they answer to NO ONE !!!!!!

  20. Why was John O’Keefe’s sock dry on the hospital gurney after laying in the snow for 6 hours?

    I think that someone slipped the magic bullet from John Kennedy’s assassination onto the stretcher when no one was looking

  21. Something about Lally using an exclamation mark makes me extremely angry. Everything else he does pisses me off, but this infuriates me for some reason.

  22. Lemme get this straight; Read is indicted by a State level grand jury based on sufficient facts presented by the prosecution. Since then the same prosecution has modified, manipulated, omitted and conveniently “ re-interpreted “ the original facts, thereby nullifying the initial bases the initial indictment was based on. So when the case isn’t going their way the Commonwealth gets to raise the goal posts at their leisure??? These are 3rd world banana republic puppet government tactics! This is precisely why our founding fathers insisted on the SECOND AMENDMENT!

  23. How are they aloud to do this? It blows my mind. They get caught red handed and it’s oops we made a mistake. No you got caught lieing

  24. How does auntie bev feel about the prosecution lying to her in court? Judge Judy would never put up with this.

  25. So what about Matt McCabe testimony about 3 point turn?
    And is it common for a a prosecutor To change theory almost 2 years in?
    Now the defense is forced to have to debunk a different theory. One that is just as ridiculous as the first?
    Scary to live in this area!

  26. Apparently the D A discounts Nagle’s testimony of what he saw. Also, what the sober plow driver saw. Yet the people who were intoxicated and staid awake all night are to be believed? This is some special kind of messed up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *