TB Investigates

Canton Cover-Up Part 176: Ryan Nagel’s Statements Prove That Karen Read Did Not Hit John O’Keefe At 12:25 As Commonwealth Says She Did 

 

– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– Donate to the Karen Read Legal Defense Fund
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group

 

The two most important, reliable, and truthful witnesses in the Karen read case are Brian Loughran and Ryan Nagel. And although Loughran’s testimony that there was no body on the front lawn of 34 Fairview Road at 2:30 AM completely exonerates Karen Read, there is no person whose recounting of the events that night is more problematic for the Commonwealth than Nagel’s.

Ryan Nagel is virtually invisible online. When you search his name the only unfortunate thing that comes up is a mugshot from a Florida DUI.

But a lot of people have decent people have made the poor decision to drive when they shouldn’t, so this doesn’t define him. People who know Ryan say that he’s a good person and respectful.

Nagel arrived at 34 Fairview Road at almost the same time that Karen Read did. He sat in the passenger seat of Richie D’Antuono’s truck, with his girlfriend Heather Maxon in the backseat. His testimony about what he saw proved that John O’Keefe was not in Karen’s car, nor was John lying on the ground outside of her car. Yet Karen Read was indicted for manslaughter 6 days before Nagel was interviewed by Yuriy Bukhenik on February 7, 2022.

Ryan had his friend Richie drive to 34 Fairview Road because Ryan’s sister Julie Nagel had called him looking for a ride home. Richie D’Anuono and Karen Read were traveling down Cedercrest Road from opposite directions and arrived at Fairview Road at the same time. Richie yielded to Karen and allowed her to turn first.

No one in the truck saw John O’Keefe go into the house, which critics suggest is proof that John never went inside. But when John arrived there were several cars already parked in the driveway, including the McCabes, Alberts, and Brian Higgins. If John jumped out of the car and ran into the house, as a normal person wearing a light pullover would do in a snowstorm, then he could’ve gotten to the door in a couple seconds. The cars parked in the driveway would’ve acted as a shield, and in the dark and snowy conditions Nagel would not have seen him run inside.

Nagel told police that Karen’s car pulled up to where John’s body was later found after they arrived seconds later. Richie’s truck sat in front of the home for 5 minutes, waiting for Julie Nagel to come outside so they could give her a ride home. But instead of getting in the truck, Julie invited Ryan inside. Keep in mind, during those 5 minutes John’s phone was ascending and descending stairs before it stopped moving. Julie would’ve had full knowledge that John had been assaulted when she finally came outside.

At no point did police ask any of people in the truck what Julie Nagel’s behavior was like. Did she seem like herself? Did she appear to be rattled, like she had just witnessed something? Did she give an explanation about why she asked them to drive there in a snowstorm to give her a ride home, only to suddenly decide she didn’t need a ride after all? Did they ask Julie Nagel why she told her brother that she was going to sleep at 34 Fairview Road, only to leave an hour later with Jen McCabe? These are questions you ask when you’re trying to solve a murder, which the State Police had no intention of doing.

Ryan Nagel also told police that Karen Read’s brake lights were illuminated, and didn’t appear to be broken.

Ryan Nagel’s version of events is in direct conflict with the latest “statements of fact” from the Commonwealth. According to forensic expert Westfield State graduate Nicholas Guarino, John’s phone shows him arriving at Brian Albert’s house at 12:24:34, and implies that he was struck at 12:25:36.

If that were the case then John was run over by Karen one minute after getting there. Since Nagel was behind them it would’ve been impossible for the three people inside the truck not to witness John being struck. This means that all three witnesses in Richie’s truck are either lying to cover for Karen Read, or Westfield State graduate Nicholas Guarino is not the forensic expert that the Commonwealth purports that he is.

Additionally, Nagel stated that he did not hear any screams, and when they left 5-6 minutes after arriving they did not see John O’Keefe inside or outside of Karen Read’s vehicle.

When they first indicted Karen they were clearly trying to give the impression that John was struck AFTER Nagel left, not before. It’s why Jen McCabe told them that she saw Karen drive away at 12:45. They must have forgotten about this, because the new theory they’re running with is that she hit him at 12:25:36, and then immediately left the scene.

If it happened at 12:25, which the prosecution says it did, then all of this would have been witnessed by Nagel and the two other people inside the truck.

Julie Nagel likely had nothing to do with John O’Keefe being attacked inside the house, but she has certainly lied to investigators since then. She told Michael Proctor that she saw something shadowy on the lawn, 9 months after the murder. She was likely coached to say that because it was suspicious that no other witness saw John’s body on the lawn. Her statement made it seem like something MIGHT have been there. She’s not only guilty of remaining silent while Karen Read is charged with a crime that Julie Nagel knows she did not commit, she’s also gone out of her way to lie in a statement that was designed to further incriminate Karen Read.

Ryan Nagel might be in an uncomfortable situation because of this. He cannot take back what he told investigators, and was a loose end that the Alberts and McCabes could not control. But his statements indirectly incriminated his sister, and exonerate Karen Read. They were helpful to her defense from the beginning, but the latest theory from the Commonwealth makes him an ever more valuable witness for them.

 

Hello Turtle Riders. As you know if you follow Turtleboy we are constantly getting censored and banned by Facebook for what are clearly not violations of their terms of service. Twitter has done the same, and trolls mass reported our blog to Google AdSense thousands of times, leading to demonetization. We can get by and survive, but we could really use your help. Please consider donating by hitting the Donation button above if you'd like support free speech and what we do in the face of Silicon Valley censorship. Or just buy our award winning book about the dangers of censorship and rise of Turtleboy:  Qries

30 Comments

  1. Look at a map of the area. John’s phone GPS data is inconsistent with Ryan’s statement. One implies Karen drove west down cedarcrest, the other implies she was traveling south on cedarcrest.

    According to the commonwealth, Johns phone data says that Karen took a right on to Cedarcrest from Oakdale Rd. To get to 34 Fairview, she would have to drive WEST down Cedarcrest and take a LEFT onto Fairview.

    Ryan’s statement says that the truck he was in driving from the direction of the Kennedy school (which is also heading west on Cedarcrest). He says that the truck yielded allowing Karen to take a RIGHT onto Cedarcrest. This implies Karen was driving SOUTH on Cedarcrest, and took a RIGHT onto Fairview.

    Why are these two thing inconsistent?

    1. Never mind. i’m an idiot. teh CW says she drove around cedarcrest to the north and turned around. The two statements are in fact consistent

  2. Why would Julie invite him in if she’d just seen an assault? That part is not adding up for me.

    1. She came out when John was inside being attacked. She goes back in & potentially really didn’t see anything. That is why Jennifer McCabe mentioned her by name and not Levinson. She saw nothing so she wouldn’t need to lie for them

    2. The only way she would invite her brother in, is 1) “most likely” if she wasn’t aware of the fight, which is very possible. They all had been drinking all day, probably had music on, and let’s be honest, all of these clowns seem like an obnoxious, loud, wanna be heard idiot we’ve all see in a bar, there happened to be several together in this case, I’m sure it was loud. 2) “seems unlikely” She was afraid and told she couldn’t leave then and asked her brother in because she was scared, 3) “not likely” there was no fight and O’Keefe wasn’t in the house.

      My question is , we know she ask for a ride home, then she invite her brother in, WHY didn’t he go in, and WHY didn’t she leave? I mean could be he just didn’t want to go in, simple, but why did she decide to stay? Could be absolutely nothing, and honestly it doesn’t matter, the defense doesn’t need to prove WHO killed O’Keefe, they only have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Karen didn’t, and that SOMEONE else could have! It’s the Commonwealth’s job to find the guilty party, (hang on I gotta stop laughing) not the defense’s.

      1. I just read his statement to police and have a 4th reason, 4) “also highly likely” John was inside, she just never saw him for whatever reason and the fight hadn’t happened yet when she went out to talk to her brother, (or she lied to cover for them, which I kinda doubt) It could’ve happened later, it could’ve been happening right then! She literally oils be completely in the dark about a fight, especially if she was drinking and they were split into groups, which happens at parties. Younger kids together in 1 part of house, older adult females in another, guys in another, like the basement!

    3. According to Nagel, he arrived at the same time as Karen. Maybe Julie had heard “someone” talking shit about John and that he might be showing up soon. Then the two met going and coming at the door. At that point, she knew something was about to happen so decided to stay and asked her brother and friends if they would like to see some action. Maybe Nagel isn’t telling everything.

    1. Cmon Nagel and Lunchbox aren’t even close to being comparable. Also this kid is the only one telling the truth and didn’t get the pep talk inside the house. Hopefully they don’t get to him and he tells the same story.

  3. I’m also confused. Julie invited them in. So either the assault hadn’t happened yet, or unbeknownst to her it was in progress. Otherwise why on earth would she have done that? Thanks. I’m slow on the uptake, perhaps.

    1. I think it happened while she was outside they could have hid him in the basement. Thats why Jen used her name and not Levinson’s, she wouldn’t have to lie

  4. HaHaHa – Another of Norwood’s brightest…Westfield State expert in anything is laughable. I went to Norwood High and knew Nick and his sister. Nice enough guy but I wouldn’t say his MENSA application will ever get approved.

  5. He also stated there was just a “coating of snow on the ground”, so how much snow was under John’s body?

  6. The defense is going to rip the evidence apart piece by piece – slowly and methodically. Lally won’t be able to get away with his mumbling explanations of his weak and ever changing theories during an actual jury trial. No way a well informed jury will find Read guilty.
    Let just hope they actually go after the person or persons responsible for the cruel and senseless death of Boston Police Officer John OKeefe

    1. Sadly if and hopefully when Karen Read is found innocent I have no doubt that this murder will get swept under the rug. They will no go after the perpetrators or perp. All because of who they are.

  7. Windy Wendy from Belmont thinks juries are full of idiots.
    How is the state going to find 12 complete idiots for trial?
    The amount of reasonable doubt is intense. Glad to know the bumbling Commonwealth is helping the talented defense attorneys with their nonsense.

  8. I don’t get how the prosecuted can keep changing their theory? I get if new evidence came forward but it hasn’t only evidence that debunks their theory. Let’s just keep making shit up til something sticks is what their doing and it’s a joke.

  9. Nice recap of evidences. at this point it seems as though Lolly is lolly gagging because he doesn’t have a case. he seem like he is now the Alberts Attorney instead of prosecutor.

  10. I haven’t seen a case this gripping in a long time. I am an avid court watcher for years. ever since Court Tv became a channel and Pam Smarts case was televised. I believe Karen is innocent. And let’s say she wasn’t. I would NOT be able to convict her. There is just too much reasonable doubt. The people in the Albert house have all done some shady things. There is more circumstantial evidence to believe one of them if guilty of murder then anything. I saw the one pic where Colin has the messed up knuckles after the “Murder” and he definitely was punching something.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *