TB Investigates

Canton Coverup Part 333: Commonwealth Offers No Experts To Counter Testimony From 4 Accident Reconstruction Experts Testifying That John O’Keefe Wasn’t Struck By Vehicle

 

– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– Donate to the Karen Read Legal Defense Fund
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group

The witness list for the Karen Read murder trial has come out, and although there are many familiar names there are also several individuals we have never heard of before.

CW-Pretrial-Memo-and-Witness-List-and-Defense-Witness-list

It should be noted that the Commonwealth has yet to explain their theory for how John O’Keefe got these injuries from a vehicle striking him in reverse:

They do not have any experts listed on their witness list who will attempt to explain how a man hit by a 3 ton vehicle:

  • doesn’t have any broken bones or bruising from his nose to his toes
  • appears to have a bruise on his right knuckle from punching something
  • has a linear 3 inch laceration in the back of his head despite landing on snowy grass
  • has two severely black eyes
  • has parallel bit marks on his arms that appear to come from a dog, while being found outside the home of a house with a German shepherd that has sent multiple people to the ER and has completely disappeared

They simply want you to take their word for it that a Lexus hit John while traveling 24.2 mph in reverse, only broke the vehicle’s tail light, and catapulted John 12 feet onto the grass, which caused all those injuries. They want the jury to believe that these injuries make sense because Karen left angry voicemails that night, got into an argument with John in Aruba a month prior, and may have been smooching with Brian Higgins in a garage. When women get angry they can apparently defy the laws of physics, and the Commonwealth hopes the jurors will overlook the science of it all and instead focus on what a bad person Karen Read is.

The defense is taking a different approach though. They’ve decided to add several expert witnesses who they intend to testify at trial. These include Dr. Frank Sheridan, who will testify that the dog bites on John’s arm are in fact dog bites, and Richard Green, an expert in digital forensics who used Cellebrite to find Jennifer McCabe’s deleted 2:27 Google search and over 20 deleted phone calls between 5-9 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022.

However, even more noteworthy is that they have brought in four experts, three of whom have PhD’s, to explain whether or not John O’Keefe’s injuries could’ve come from a vehicle collision. These are the same independent experts hired by the FBI as part of their investigation into the State Police and the Norfolk District Attorney’s Office, who reached the conclusion that John’s injuries were inconsistent with a motor vehicle collision. Their names are Chris Van Ee, Daniel Wolfe, Andrew Renschler, and Scott Kline.

Wolfe, Rentschler, and Kline all work for ARCCA, Inc, a Pennsylvania based company that uses the latest technology to evaluate injury causation and accident reconstructions, amongst other things. They conduct investigations, do testing, write expert reports, prepare exhibits, and regularly do trial testimony, according to their website.

ARCCA employs over 40 experts listed on their website. Their biomechanical engineers have considerable experience analyzing the cause of head injuries, which seems to germane to the Read case since John O’Keefe’s head injuries will have to be explained.

Dr. Daniel Wolfe is the Senior Forensic Scientist at ARCCA, who specializes in accident reconstruction. According to his bio Dr. Wolfe investigates and reconstructs vehicle collisions, and is an accredited Traffic Accident Reconstructionist by the Accrediation Commission for Traffic Accident Reconstruction.

Dr. Andrew Renstchler is a Senior Biochemist who specializes in the study of the forces and mechanics associated with injuries to the human body.

His expertise seems to be particularly relevant since John’s injuries will have to be explained, and he does this for a living. He has conducted several studies to evaluate the biomechanics of the human body during collisions.

Scott Kline frequently testifies at trials involving vehicle collisions, and is a Senior Accident Reconstructionist who specializes in the investigation of motor vehicle collisions. His expertise includes vehicle accident reconstruction, and imaging of event data recorders (EDR) in vehicles.

Although his expertise is usually used by insurance companies to determine who is liable for vehicle collisions, it is also going to come in hand in the Karen Read murder case since her EDR data will need to be explained and the Commonwealth has made no effort to reconstruct the vehicle collision that they believe killed John O’Keefe.

Dr. Chris Van Ee works for a company called Design Research Engineering in Michigan.

His company provides engineering services that focus on forensic investigations and has performed thousands of accident investigations. His specialties include impact biomechanics, accident reconstruction, mechanical engineering, and injury causation. These seem like very valuable skills since an accident reconstruction will be need to explain whether or not John O’Keefe’s injury causation was the result of being struck by Karen Read’s vehicle.

Dr. Van Ee’s resume shows that he is an award winning crash reconstructionist.

VanEe.Chris2011

In a 2007 court case in which he was an expert witness, the defendant attempted to have his testimony thrown out. The motion failed because Dr. Van Ee is a “well qualified bio-mechanical engineer,” whose “analysis seems adequately grounded in science.”

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-alnd-4_05-cv-01026/pdf/USCOURTS-alnd-4_05-cv-01026-0.pdf

Just to review:

  • The defense plans to use the testimony of four seasoned experts, three of whom are doctors with extensive trial experience, and who are so trusted that the FBI uses them for their investigations, to explain why John’s injuries couldn’t come from a vehicle collision.
  • The Commonwealth plans to counter that by questioning a basic bitch named Marietta about what a cunt Karen Read was to her in Aruba in an attempt to distract jurors from the fact that they have no explanation for how John O’Keefe got his injures.

We will see which side makes the more convincing case in the next two months.

 

Hello Turtle Riders. As you know if you follow Turtleboy we are constantly getting censored and banned by Facebook for what are clearly not violations of their terms of service. Twitter has done the same, and trolls mass reported our blog to Google AdSense thousands of times, leading to demonetization. We can get by and survive, but we could really use your help. Please consider donating by hitting the Donation button above if you'd like support free speech and what we do in the face of Silicon Valley censorship. Or just buy our award winning book about the dangers of censorship and rise of Turtleboy:  Qries

49 Comments

  1. The state will be destroyed in court. If this even gets to deliberations, I’ll be shocked. Deliberations will last an hour, not guilty. Every single scumbag asshole associated with the states case should be fired and have pensions seized. Hahaha right sure, they’ll get a raise, cocksuckers

    1. If deliberations last an hour it will only be because they waited to get lunch before announcing they reached a verdict.

    2. They might find the CW & Auntie Bev guilty for wasting their time on a case that should never have been brought.

  2. Anyone feel sick to their stomach when they think about how cruel and brutal Officer John O’Keefe’s death was? I certainly do. Makes me sick and it makes me angry.

    It’s really time for more law enforcement agencies to start speaking up and speaking out.

    When, and if, a trial starts the world is going to see first hand just how pathetic, incompetent and corrupt the DA is, his troopers, the judge, Canton PD, and how evil some of John’s so called “friends” are. Who would ever believe that a soccer mom, mother of 4 girls, would be so vile and take part in planning a man’s death. There is something just so morally wrong with Jennifer McCabe. A BAD SEED for sure.

    I still hope this trial gets halted before it gets started but if it doesn’t it will be quite enjoyable to watch this corruption unfold and those responsible be outed for the world to see.

  3. Might be good this will all play out and be on the record.
    Might make it harder for MA authorities to broom the actual homicide case that needs to take place

    1. “Might make it harder for MA authorities to broom the actual homicide case that needs to take place”

      I may be cynical, but an acquittal might be the best outcome for the state and all those folks involved. If KR is convicted I imagine there are sufficient grounds for an appeal, which creates new headaches for these people. If she is acquitted they can shrug their shoulders, blame it on the fancy celebrity lawyers overpowering the poor public servants, and go back to business as usual. Do you think there would be a murder investigation? Who would spearhead that? Here in Chicago I think only about 25% of murders are solved.

      Dr. Fang

      CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be.
      -Ambrose Bierce

    2. C’mon man. It’s Massachusetts. Remember Chappaquidick? Baker’s son Gropy? No case too big to broom.

  4. The sad part is that John’s family will have to sit and watch the trial and come to the realization that these people are lying evil pieces of shit.

    Or they won’t. They’ll still believe the fairy tale of Back The Blue

  5. The process is the punishment. The DA doesn’t care if Karen gets acquitted. Bankrupting her would be an even better result. They have a defendant who can pay for a high priced defense attorney and raft of experts. Good for her. She’ll have to pay for all of them and goes broke. The DA doesn’t care about what they spend. After all, it’s not their money; it’s yours. Suckers. NCDAO would have dropped this in a heartbeat if she was using a Public Defender. If you want to know why they haven’t dropped the case, this is it. These people are petty tyrants who will pay no price for their actions.

      1. Will some lose their jobs? Possibly. Will they lose their pensions? Absolutely not! Jail time? Unlikely. I hate to be that guy, but I’ve lived in this state too long to think otherwise.

        1. You’re not wrong but there is too much visibility on this case now for everyone to skate on a murder coverup of a cop by law enforcement and a frame up to boot. Will there be patsies or will the Feds do their jobs is the question.

  6. If I was on this jury I’d be pissed that my time is being wasted. At what point do they stand up and ask Auntie Bev,”Why are we even here?”. DY & AJ should thank them for their time in their opening remarks and then apologize that the CW couldn’t even be bothered to conduct a proper investigation let alone a basic accident reconstruction. They won’t even need to tell the jury about a 3rd party culprit, I think they’ll figure it out for themselves. Good grief!

    1. “They won’t even need to tell the jury about a 3rd party culprit, I think they’ll figure it out for themselves.”

      Is there a living breathing literate adult human being in that town or county who is unaware of all the details of this case?

    1. It’s really looking like it was Berkowitz that planted the evidence. But we’ve heard Proctor, Bukhenic and Higgins were right there with him. I wonder if any of the jurors will have a hard time believing that police officers could be so corrupt? Younger people will accept that theory far easier than older jurors.

      1. The defense should ask for Proctor work cell GPS data. See if it lines up on the dates and times when he allegedly found the tailight on the lawn on those 5 separate trips.

        I say this because I know this a new nationwide tactic that defense attorneys are asking for when they are trying to discredit police officers when things look shady.

  7. This was all about muddying the waters so the real killers would never be found. They knew it was a long shot proving Karen killed Officer O’Keefe but they didn’t care they dragged it out to make her pay. If they really wanted to know who killed Officer O’Keefe perform the Geofence prove he was in the house and find out whose FN car was parked in front of 34 Fairview at 2:30 am the night he was killed

    1. The farther you lead them down the wrong path, the harder it is to find the trail of the real culprits…

    1. Doesn’t really matter. You’ll never land a woman like her. Do you ever ask yourself how you ended up living in your mommy’s basement at middle age?

    2. It helps more than if she weighed 600 pounds for certain. It’s helping you feed the chickens if nothing else.

  8. Do you think Lally and others from the DA’S Office have given any thought as to how incompetent they will look during a trial? Doesn’t it seem like it could be career ending for any of them that get up on that witness stand as a representative from that office?

    Incompetent and Corruption on full display for all the world to see.

  9. If anyone wants to make some good side money, setup a corner stand at Washington and Chapman Streets to sell Depends Adult Diapers. A lot of McAlbert supporters are going to start shitting their pants very soon!

  10. The cross examination of witnesses is going to be epic for the defense. The Commonwealth is going to look vindictive and incompetent and hopefully they will all be led out in handcuffs right in the middle of the first day. What the fuck are the Feds waiting for unless they are planning a shock and awe display. They have to know it looks horrible for them if they don’t do anything. But you never know because like the Dropkick Murphys say in Shattered: Who ya gonna call, the local cops stalking girls down the mall or the world’s greatest crooks for the FBI? The crooks for the FBI!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *