Canton Coverup Part 374: Anonymous Juror Cites Fake Witness Intimidation From Turtleboy As Reason Juror Names Should Be Impounded

 

– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– Donate to the Karen Read Legal Defense Fund
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group

 

An anonymous juror from the Karen Read trial has lawyered up and filed a motion to extend the impoundment order preventing the identities of jurors from becoming public. On paper this seems like common sense, but after reading the motion it’s obviously this juror was being advised by the Commonwealth, and is pushing a false narrative that Michael Morrissey’s Office has been pushing about “witness intimidation” from Turtleboy. In an after David “written” by the anonymous juror they claim that their personal safety is at risk because “individuals associated with this case have been charged criminally with intimidation.” The juror goes on to describe testimony from Jennifer McCabe, which was allowed into trial by Judge Cannone despite motions from both the defense AND the Commonwealth to exclude it, in which McCabe cries about imaginary “intimidation.” The juror admits to not knowing any of the specifics of the “harassment,” and went on to say that they could hear protesters outside while they deliberated.

There is no possible way jurors could hear protesters through the thick stone walls of the courthouse. That was the whole point of the 200 foot buffer zone. No one was outside screaming or yelling. Supporters peacefully sat in their chairs and held signs outside of the buffer zone. Cars that honked were pulled over and ticketed. It was as controlled as you can possibly get.

The fact that this juror believed a word that Jennifer McCabe said about “harassment” is a big part of the problem here. Only a complete idiot could listen to her fake cry about “shock and hoorrrraaahhh,” or claim that she didn’t delete ANY phone calls despite her cell phone data showing she deleted over a dozen calls that morning, and believe that this woman wasn’t involved in the murder of John O’Keefe. What this juror wasn’t made privy to was that Jen McCabe applied for and was denied a HARASSMENT prevention order against Turtleboy because my speech did not rise to “true threats.” Nor have I been convicted of any sort of witness intimidation. I was indicted, because the same people who lied to the Read jury about not seeing John inside Brian Albert’s house that night also lied to a grand jury about being in a state of fear due to my investigative journalism.

The juror made up a completely fabricated story about members of the media waiting for them in a parking where the bus dropped them off. The juror admits to being paranoid and wrongly believed that a reporter was following them home. The juror then baselessly asserts that there will “likely be a physical confrontation” if the juror list is made public.

I can tell you that not a single member of the media had any idea where the jurors’ bus dropped them off, nor do we care. If this juror was telling the truth then they would’ve taken pictures of the media who were lying in wait for them. No media outlet has published any such pictures, nor has any media outlet identified any of the jurors by name. This idea that if their names are made public it will likely lead to a physical confrontation is completely coached by the Commonwealth to give the false narrative that peaceful protesters are dangerous, and investigative journalism is witness intimidation.

The juror goes on to cite a completely biased and one-sided article in the Boston Globe, in which they quoted “dangerous things” people on Facebook have said.

The juror claims that they’ve seen social media posts “attacking the integrity of the judge,” and to this juror that means that he or she will be physically attacked if their name is made public.

Ya got that? Despite not a single instance of physical violence involving Karen Read supporters, this juror says that they are in fear of being physically attacked because people criticized a public servant making over $200K a year for her obvious bias and incompetence overseeing a murder trial. This is just more evidence this entire thing was coached on by the Commonwealth and Auntie Bev.

The juror goes on to cite random Twitter accounts that have clipped episodes of the Turtleboy Live show, including one where I state that I know the identity of the jury foreman and what he does for a living. The juror wrongly says that I “demand to know the identity of the fucking idiot on this jury.”

Except:

1. The fact that this juror points out that I’ve been charged with “witness intimidation,” tells you everything you need to know about how they were coached to write this. No rational person who has looked at the charges against me believes that they have any merit.
2. I already know the identity of the foreman, so I don’t need to “demand” to know who he is.
3. I’m allowed to say what the jury foreman does for work.
4. I NEVER said where the jury foreman lives and still don’t know.
5. I’m allowed to say the identity of the foreman if I want to. The impoundment order just prevents the court from disclosing the names of jurors to the public.
6. We’re allowed to criticize judges.
7. The only person threatened with physical violence has been Turtleboy, after Jennifer McCabe’s brother in law threatened to bury my corpse in the yard of Judge Cannone’s Cape house.

The juror goes on to talk about how I’ve been accused of “harassing witnesses” by bringing crowds to their homes, and they’re worried I will do the same to jurors. Except two “witnesses” applied for HARASSMENT prevention orders against me and were denied, and the July 22 rolling rally was peaceful and didn’t lead to any calls to the police about trespassing, violence, or vandalism.

The juror baselessly states that there is a “very real probability” of a physical confrontation with jurors if their names are made public. They also go on to mention physical confrontations between the two sides of supporters. Additionally, the juror cites a tweet from Fall River Reporter journalist Jessica Machado, who recently posted about a woman who tried and failed to get a harassment prevention order against her.

1. You don’t just get to go around making up probabilities. That’s not how the laws of probability work.
2. There wasn’t a single documented incident of physical confrontations between supporters on either side. Supporters of the Commonwealth were nonexistent until the last day of deliberations.
3. A woman named Holly McNamara applied for a ridiculous and baseless order against Jessica Machado. Holly is a FKR supporter and Machado is a reporter. The proposed order had nothing to do with anything related to the Karen Read case.

The juror’s after David contains screenshots of random Turtleboy blogs where Chris Albert sexually harassed women wearing Free Karen Read shirts.

It also contained a tweet from Machado showing Grant Smith-Ellis threatening random women before he was eventually banned from the courtroom.

The motion from the juror’s attorneys cites Judge Cannone’s incorrect statement that “witness intimidation has been prevalent” in this case, when in fact no one has been convicted of any sort of witness intimidation.

Most notable is that the juror doesn’t deny the previous reports that the jurors were 12-0 in favor of not guilty on the murder charge and leaving the scene of a deadly accident. The motion even says that the jury was “unable to render a unanimous verdict on all three counts of indictment.” That is NOT the same thing as ANY counts of the indictment.

This is yet another confirmation of the 12-0 acquittal.

The attorney for the juror cites my criminal charges and wrongly states that I admitted to harassing witnesses.

Judge Cannone still has not responded to the after Davids of 2 jurors and 2 informants who confirmed the 12-0 acquittal vote on murder. However, she did respond in less than 5 minutes to this anonymous juror and agreed to impound the jurors’ names because she finds this juror credible, and says their fears are reasonable.

Juror Doe hasn’t established anything except that they are paranoid and don’t want to be publicly criticized. This juror is CLEARLY one of the morons who voted to convict on manslaughter and sought out the Commonwealth for help. This juror is likely the foreman himself, and although I do know his name and have every right to report it, I am still choosing to not to do so for now. Impounding the names of jurors does not prevent any member of the media from reporting facts they know. I did not find out this juror’s name by looking for him either. Two people sent it to me, including a coworker, because the former police officer insists on talking about the case at work.

This is yet another example of Norfolk County using imaginary “fear” of free speech to create a chilling effect with the goal of infringing on the First Amendment rights of journalists and citizens.