Canton Coverup Part 489: Hank Brennan Adds Turtleboy To Witness List, No Longer Calling Allie McCabe Or Nicholas Barros

 

– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group

As was widely reported yesterday, the Commonwealth’s witness list for Karen Read’s murder trial came out yesterday and this award winning journalist is on it.

Notable omissions include Allie McCabe and Dighton Police Sgt. Nicholas Barros.

McCabe’s testimony in the first trial was mainly used in an attempt to exonerate Colin Albert, which means that Hank Brennan probably doesn’t like her story very much because it has so many holes in it. Last trial she was confronted with Life 360 data showing that she was out until 1:30 AM, despite telling police that she had dropped Colin Albert off and was back at home by 12:30. She had no explanation, other than saying that the data was wrong.

McCabe’s story also doesn’t make any sense, unless she is the town Uber volunteer. She claims she picked Colin up at Brian Albert’s house at 12:10 AM, before John O’Keefe was in the house (her own words). Her family submitted a screenshot of what she claims is a text message between her and Colin Albert, in which she says “here” at 12:10.

It doesn’t say where “here” is, and it doesn’t make sense that she would pick Colin up at his friend Mikey Leonis’ house, drop Colin off at Brian Albert’s house so he could wish his gay autistic ogre cousin a happy birthday in person (without any friends joining him), and then pick him up right before his fun uncle and their friends got back to start partying. Because Colin Albert HATES partying, and deeply respects his non-existent curfew so he can kiss his Mommy and Daddy good night before tucking himself in.

Allie was also the first witness to mention alleged harassment and witness intimidation, despite laughing with her mother when I attempted to ask Jennifer McCabe questions at the Billerica lacrosse game on June 5, 2023. On the stand she cried fake tears in order to deflect from her suspicious behavior.

Nicholas Barros was a great witness for the defense at the first trial, although I think the defense made a mistake in not cross examining him. The DPD sergeant’s report proved that Michael Proctor lied when he wrote that he towed Karen Read’s car from her parents’ house at 5:30 PM. But it was his testimony about how he observed Read’s vehicle that really stood out:

“That taillight was not completely damaged, it was cracked and a piece was missing, but not completely damaged.”

He made sure to say that the taillight was not completely damaged TWICE, without being prompted to do so. He made sure to say that one singular piece was missing. This guy KNOWS that there could not have been 47 pieces of taillight sitting on Brian Albert’s front lawn at 4:15 PM on January 29. And if the defense had cross examined him, showed him a picture of the taillight in the CPD Sallyport garage, and asked him, “did the taillight look like this?”, he would’ve enthusiastically said “No.” He was signaling to the defense that he wanted them to ask that question, and he knows that in the second trial they will.

This is why Hank Brennan isn’t bringing Sgt. Barros back – he’s an honest cop who doesn’t want to participate in the framing of an innocent woman for murder. At the last hearing Hank showed the court a picture of Karen’s cracked, but not completely damaged taillight at Meadows Ave and in Dighton. It appeared as if he was trying to make the defense’s case for them, but then he put on a master display of gaslighting when he announced that the taillight was completely broken when it clearly wasn’t.

There is a 0.0% chance Hank Brennan plans on calling me as a witness. He would have to be incredibly stupid to do so, and it would be at his own peril. The only interest he could have in me is in attempting to prove that Karen Read had a consciousness of guilt, and thus she hired me to intimidate witnesses. If Hank dare called me to the stand I would make it clear that, 1) I haven’t intimidated anyone, 2) Karen Read doesn’t get to tell me what to do, and 3) I peacefully protested against his witnesses because it’s undeniable that they murdered John O’Keefe and have been lying about it since. I’ll point out how the FBI launched an investigation into the case and called all these witnesses to testify in front of the grand jury, specifically because they knew Karen Read didn’t hit OJO with her car.

We all agree Spanky wouldn’t be THAT foolish. So why am I on the list then? Simple – he wants to:

1. Prevent me from being in the courtroom during the trial
2. Prevent me from watching the trial at all
3. Prevent me from tweeting about the trial
4. Prevent me from writing articles about the trial
5. Prevent me from doing my show

During the last trial my subscribers doubled on YouTube from 50K to 100K in a couple months. My Twitter following also doubled, and my shows were getting record number of views. Business was really good, as the trial was supposed to be the end product of all of my labor and sacrifice.

But a sequestration order for witnesses would prevent me from reporting, discussing, or watching ANY of the trial. Hank is doing this to limit my influence because he knows how influential and popular my content is. He’s doing this because he knows this is my livelihood and he wants to inflict economic harm on me while I’m a witness. He’s doing this because he has no case against Karen Read, and throwing up the Hail Mary of “witness intimidation” is all he’s got to work with. My lawyers are working on it, which is my only comment on the matter for now.

For what it’s worth, if I had to pick between being in the court as a reporter for the entire trial, and being able to testify as a witness, I would choose the latter. I am an encyclopedia of knowledge on the Karen Read case, and there’s nothing I would rather do more than destroy Hank Brennan’s case for him.