TB Investigates

Karen Read Trial Day 1 And 2 Recap: Opening Statements, Paul And Erin O’Keefe, Officers Saraf And Mullaney, Canton Firefighters

 

Donate to the Turtleboy Legal defense fund

– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– Donate to the Karen Read Legal Defense Fund
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group

 

For the last year we’ve been hearing from the McAlbert Mafia that we need to “wait until trial” for the “big bombshells” the Commonwealth had to offer. However, if the first two days are any indication then it appears as if the bombshells will all be coming from the defense, and the Commonwealth witnesses will actually help to exonerate Karen Read. Here are some highlights from Day 1 and 2:

  • Adam Lally spoke for 45 minutes in his usual uninspiring, monotone voice, and rambled on about the Waterfall Bar, random people who saw John and Karen arguing in Aruba a month before he was murdered, and other things that are not the least bit convincing while trying to convince a jury that a woman is guilty of murder. It went over horribly with legal pundits seeing him for the first time.
  • David Yannetti gave an impassioned opening statement that started off by saying, “Karen Read was framed.” He spent the rest of the time explaining to the jury how they knew John O’Keefe was killed inside 34 Fairview Road, and he named names. If there was supposed to be a limit on bringing up third party culprit theories in the opening it was completely ignored by Auntie Bev.
  • Yannetti pointed out that Michael Proctor’s mother called the Alberts a second family and that he sat at a table with Chris, Julie, and Colin Albert at his sister’s wedding. Both of these facts were first reported on TB Daily News.
  • The FBI investigation revealed hat Michael Proctor used his personal cell phone to text a friend that he hoped Karen Read killed herself, that he was disappointed he couldn’t find naked pictures of her, and that Brian Albert wasn’t in danger of being investigated because he was a Boston cop. Proctor certainly would be a lot better off if Read did kill herself, but unfortunately she’s too strong for him. The noodz don’t prove that he framed her for murder (it certainly puts in the minds of the jurors that he’s an unethical pig) but the fact that he said Brian Albert had nothing to worry about certainly seems to indicate that.
  • It’s pretty ironic that Proctor said he wanted Read to kill herself since his wife Elizabeth contacted a woman’s employer last month for making a comment on Facebook about how Proctor might kill himself as a result of the FBI investigation into him.

  • Paul and Erin O’Keefe both testified that Karen was a good influence on John’s children, that they liked her, and that her fights with John were typical of any couple. Their testimony wasn’t the least bit damaging to Read.
  • Paul O’Keefe testified that John was happy after his niece/daughter was accepted to Bishop Feehan High School. John wanted his kids to go to Catholic school and didn’t want them to become Canton townies. After he died Jennifer McCabe formed “Peggy’s Angels,” a “support” group for John’s mother and niece. She kept them close and wanted John’s niece to be close with her kids. A year later McCabe was bringing John’s niece to Canton High School orientation as she unenrolled from Feehan.
  • Paul O’Keefe testified that Read was distraught and crying, asking if John was alive at the hospital. In other words, she was acting with genuine shock and concern. 
  • Paul O’Keefe described John’s body in the hospital as one would describe a person who just got beaten up in a fight.
  • The Commonwealth spent an hour showing Ring camera footage from outside 1 Meadows Ave on January 29. It’s not clear what they attempted to prove with it, but it only helped Karen Read. The video shows multiple people, including John’s mother and brother, walking directly by Karen Read’s Lexus. Not one of them noticed that Karen Read’s right tail light was allegedly shattered.

  • The Commonwealth called Officer Steven Saraf, the first Canton cop to show up after Jen McCabe called 911. They played part of his dash cam videos, which showed Karen running around hysterically, as a woman who if she just found the dead body of her boyfriend. Jen McCabe is cool, calm, and collected, as she turns her back to John’s body and makes sure she’s speaking with Officer Saraf and setting the narrative. You can see her talking to him on the left hand side here. This image is from 6:15, and the Commonwealth would have you believe that 8 minutes later Read composed herself and asked McCabe to Google, “hos long to die in cold.”

  • Jennifer McCabe told Trooper Prince there was 6 inches of snow on the ground covering John O’Keefe’s body, which was why she didn’t see him when she arrived at 34 Fairview Road. Officer Saraf’s dash cam video shows less than an inch of snow on the ground. So does video from 1 Meadows Ave at 5:07 AM.

  • To further prove that there was less than 6 inches of snow just look at where the snow is on the fire hydrant near where John’s body was discovered.

  • Here is how far the hydrant caps are from the ground.

  • Officer Saraf testified that Karen Read told him “it was my fault, I did it,” when he arrived at the scene. He NEVER wrote this in his original report, stating only that she was screaming “is he dead” and was too distraught to tell him what happened. Today Alan Jackson grilled him on it, pointing out that he also told the grand jury in April of 2022 that she said “it was my fault, I did it.” He pointed out the ridiculousness that Saraf could have a better memory in April 2022 than on the day of the murder. Saraf lost all credibility.

  • Officer Saraf testified that there was no red tail light or a missing shoe at 6:10 AM when he searched the scene. Yet State Police found 4 pieces of red tail light and John’s missing shoe 12 hours later after a foot of snow had fallen. In the next few weeks Michael Proctor would find 31 more pieces on 5 undocumented searches, as would Chief Berkowitz from a moving vehicle. The ONLY physical evidence against Read are the tail light fragments.
  • Shockingly, Jackson showed dash cam video of Jennifer McCabe going inside 34 Fairview Road at 6:34 AM. Saraf admitted that he should not have allowed her to go inside the house, and that she made no mention of the fact that she was outside of her sister’s house.

  • Officer Stephen Mullaney testified that he was at the scene until 8 AM, but did nothing to secure it. There is a photograph in evidence of some random guy walking through the crime scene early in the morning.

  • Canton Firefighter Timothy Nuttall spent half an hour testifying about his credentials as a firefighter before getting to the only thing that mattered – he said that Karen Read said “I hit him, I hit him” several times in his presence. But it doesn’t matter what Karen Read said in a state of hysteria since science and crash reconstructionists have made it clear that John O’Keefe wasn’t hit by a car. 
  • Alan Jackson got Nuttall to admit on cross examination that he likely would’ve been distracted by others and might’ve misheard. More importantly, he got Nuttall to admit that he didn’t say that Karen said this until he spoke with Michael Proctor about it on February 8. He also said that he frequently talks about what happened at the fire department, as do other firefighters. Everyone seems to say more damning things about Karen Read when they speak with Michael Proctor.

Safe to say that things are not going the way the Commonwealth planned. Their entire case revolves around three things:

  1. Tail light fragments “found” at the scene.
  2. Karen admitting she did it at the scene.
  3. Karen being a crazy ex-girlfriend who wanted to kill John for months.

All three have been debunked by their own witnesses:

  1. Saraf said there was no tail light at the scene.
  2. Saraf and Mullaney never heard her say “I hit him,” and Nuttall only said that he heard her say that two weeks later, after it was all over the news that she allegedly said “I hit him” (via Jen McCabe).
  3. The O’Keefe’s said that Karen was a good person and that her fights with John were normal.

They told us to wait for the bombshells at the trial, but it appears as if all they have are duds.

 

Hello Turtle Riders. As you know if you follow Turtleboy we are constantly getting censored and banned by Facebook for what are clearly not violations of their terms of service. Twitter has done the same, and trolls mass reported our blog to Google AdSense thousands of times, leading to demonetization. We can get by and survive, but we could really use your help. Please consider donating by hitting the Donation button above if you'd like support free speech and what we do in the face of Silicon Valley censorship. Or just buy our award winning book about the dangers of censorship and rise of Turtleboy:  Qries

105 Comments

  1. Lizzy ugly twat, hows it feel knowing Mikey wanted to see karen naked and was upset there was no pics to be found. You better pick up another job, hubby will be in jail soon enough

    1. Proctor must have been done with Liz a while ago….no wonder he was too busy looking for pics that weren’t there

  2. To go so far as to describe the non-existent jacket as ‘puffy’ is interesting. He could have called it at jacket/coat and left the rest up to interpretation but ‘puffy’ is a very specific detail to remember… hmm

    1. WE have never heard of a puffy jacket before now.
      I am surprised that Jackson didn’t ask if there were tears in the newly introduced puffy jacket but I am sure that the jury is figuring things out

      1. Right @Suzanne.. and men don’t typically describe an outer layer as a puffy coat. Puffy wouldn’t be a first choice of words. I just rewatched it and he references the jacket/coat multiple times. Even goes so far as to say “he was appropriately dressed” using the term “heavy” to explain the jacket/coat

  3. Let’s remember that a jury can be as fickle as the witness list. Human beings aren’t by nature very rational. It didn’t help Douglas Mackey, Daniel Penney or Derek Chauvin.

    Still. From the outside looking in; I hope the defense has MUCH more.

    Free KR and Free TB.

    1. I kid you not. I’ve been on a jury. Got selected for alternate. The dude who was getting tried, well it was CLEAR he didn’t do it. Went to verdict and it took them 8 hours to finally clear the guy. When I talked to a dude who was on the real jury what took them so long, was told there were HALF of the jury that thought the case was so weak, there is no way it would have been tried if they (the DA) didn’t know there was more. I kid you not. The worse this case deteriorates, I honestly believe it to be worse for Karen Read. The case I was on was in Worcester by the way, back in 2005. Juries can be complete fucking imbeciles.

      1. I feel like the defense should higher a PI to assure none of the jurors have been compromised or planted by the DA considering the level of corruption in this case I wouldn’t put it past them to pay off jurors to sway their votes

    2. Minnesota is Ultra liberal, Chauvin was a scapegoat
      Mackey used his social media presence to influence voters in the 2016 presidential election
      Penney hasn’t gone to trial yet
      You’re comparing apples & oranges

      1. No. Karen Read, Derek Chauvin and Douglas Mackey were charged with crimes they in all likelihood didn’t commit, where others were not charged for similar incidences.

        I’m comparing them because they have all been charged by horrible incompetent and prejudice prosecutorial bodies.

        Mark Steyn was recently found libel of defaming Michael Mann, inspite of the witnesses who testified to the contrary and Mann perjuring himself.

  4. Lizzie Proctor worked in overdrive trying to defend her husband, while he simultaneously was humiliating her and destroying his career and reputation. Proctor compromised all integrity with his actions. Shame shame shame.

    1. Isn’t LP’s Dad the connection to Coffindufus? I wonder what he’s thinking after hearing that

  5. Need help finding a suitable gift… something that says: “I’m sorry I want to see other women naked/thanks for standing by me while covering up a murder” 🎁
    … asking for a friend

  6. From two days of testimony the things that stood out to me was Officer Saraf clearly stating he saw no red taillight pieces on the lawn and his inconsistent statements. To me it seems like once Proctor got to him that’s when his statements were tweaked.

    Paul and Erin O’Keefe didn’t hurt the defense one bit and that makes me think they believe in her innocence more than we know.

    Lally’s Opening Statement and his interviewing of witnesses is extremely boring, repetitive and much of it is pointless. This seems to be intentional and to give the jury the impression that something important is coming from these long winded witness interviews but nothing has so far. A jury will figure this out fast and once they do they will lose a lot of interest in what he is saying.

    Yannetti and Jackson are on point. Clear, concise and direct. Easy to follow and engaging to listen to.

    1. Saraf had to say that the truth was what he told to the grand jury because otherwise he’d be admitting he lied to the grand jury. He was an obnoxious, arrogant person with no credibility while testifying but at least he helped the defense.

      1. It is no coincidence that Saraf was the first officer on scene. He is part of the cover up and needs to go down.

  7. Twisted tragedies bimbo trying to stream😂
    Her new grift. Donations will go to a random domestic violence victim. Hahaha
    Yes of course they will. lol
    Get a job loser. No one can listen to you or look at you.

      1. And if you have anything to say about fake victim u gotta go through her. Bahaha. How scary.

      1. So 2 of these diseased skanks were wearing free Karen Read shirts and defending her innocence up through October?
        They had a beef with TB and they decided to turn into Karen is guilty.
        Think how incredibly stupid and pathetic that is.
        You don’t like the guy who’s talking about it so you want someone to be convicted.
        There’s a special place in hell for trash like that.

  8. Plenty of reasonable doubt already and the trial just started. Keystone cops already tripping over their dicks lol

  9. Normally you start with the Lead Investigator, but Proctor is compromised/corrupt/perverted, and Lally knew that it would be an epic fail.

    Unless they come in with a surprise bombshell, I expect a motion for a directed verdict and if it is not granted, all hell will break loose.

    1. Right? Wouldn’t the jury be wondering why lead investigator not first? That should wrap up so many questions for them. Unless every single thing he did is going to be destroyed on cross.
      How can there be a trial when the lead prosecutor is so tainted?

  10. Nuttell never even said Karen was the person to say, “I did it, I hit him.” He said it was the persons with the blood on their face, but never said which of the three persons it was. They all looked the same, white females in their mid 40’s.

    1. Proctor is DONE. I can’t see the MSP keeping him after this trial. He’s a liability and just not worth protecting anymore.

      Just so very dumb and arrogant to have risked everything for the Alberts. He chose the Alberts over his own family. His own children. A very stupid man.

    2. Kenny has gotta be shitting his pants, no fucking way he drove by days later and found red tail light fragments, give me a fucking break, wanted to involve yourself? Ha! consider yourself involved you chooch. I got a chuckle of how Helena referred to him as “Kenny” at his retirement party, really cute, I wonder if she’ll write that on his prison care packages

    1. Just validation that Timmy talking and researching about the case, cause that is nuance you know most likely by being a rider.

  11. I’m curious why no one is questioning the depth of snow covering John’s body when he was found. Officer Saraf said there was 6 inches on the ground around the body and only 1 inch covering him. Wouldn’t that mean he was recently placed there? If he had been there since 1AM – wouldn’t he and the ground been evenly covered?

    1. Not necessarily because his body temperature would still melt the snow a little. But there was barely any snow on the ground when he was found because most of the snow fell after that. Missing coat, missing shoe. His cell phone under his body, taillights everywhere (yeah right), homeowners hiding in the house and no cops thought that this was unusual?
      Meanwhile: Hey, that reporter guy has a pen- arrest him!

      1. Perhaps…you could tell the street had been plowed recently (you can actually see a plow in the dashcam video when the cop arrives) so there had to have been more than a couple inches at that time.

        Which brings up another point…Guy dead on the side of the road and recent plow activity on the street…yet the cops never thought to track down and interview the plow drivers until months later?

        1. True but a couple inches of snow is far different than six inches to a foot. You can’t miss a coat and a shoe in two inches of snow if you’re looking for it with a team of cops. Unless it’s these cops.

  12. So many thoughts…
    1) The people off Canton better hope that officer Saraf never needs to be in a foot chase. “Fat Bastard” from the “Austin Powers” movies is in better shape than this sad sack.
    2) If your wife looked anything like Lizzy Proctor, you’d be looking for noodz of other women too.
    3) Is Lally trying to change careers later in life? It seems that discussing weather is a real, burning passion of his.
    4) Unrelated to this article, Daddy… but did you see Plevin on Vinny tonight? My gawd, he makes the creature from the black lagoon look good. He gives such major icks.

    1. Dave, we need you to stay on task. FOCUS!
      7.8 Billion people on this planet, if you wanna chirp in, have a point..

  13. Proctor will not be a State Trooper very soon….. lying to the State Grand Jury and admitting it to a Federal Grand Jury. Texting his high school friends about KR, he wants her to kill her self while looking for nude pictures all on a phone he had no warrant to look at. I’m betting on Proctor eating his Service Weapon, he is unfit for duty. This idiot is going to get hammered on cross examination and look even worse. Oh Well he caused his own problems……… Proctor is a World Class Piece of Shit

    1. I’m sure Lizzie’s dad and family not too happy about their shady son in law. He is now internationally known as the piece of shit he is.
      What a f up.

  14. Please don’t ever call yourself a reporter again, after reading just the first two paragraphs I had to stop, it is a blogger script no where near the ethics of a reporter. You twist words and take others out of context no true reporter would stoop so low even a biased one such as you. When your spending all those years in prison visit the library and read up on journalism it might help. The jury is made up of intelligent people who are not going to buy all the conspiracy it just won’t work the only question left to answer is just how long KR will go to prison for, followed by you.

    1. hmm . . .

      self loathing
      brought on by constant feelings of failure, inadequacy and total worthlessness
      probably the worst case I have ever seen
      but I’m here to help
      made a list of your shortcomings and faults
      to help you be a better person

      where should I send the box ?

      dr bonedawg

    2. Lizzy?
      Kerri?
      Jen?
      RE cow?
      Krustry?
      Random side piece?
      Is pua an actual McAlbut or just a familiar?
      Game ovah loozahs.

  15. Not one mention of firefighter / EMT timothy nuttall testifying that O’Keefe’s arm had furrows? As he used his hand to let everyone see him scratching at his arm.

  16. So per some of the phone extraction’s Krusty and fake victim were stalking Alan Jackson.
    One was at his hotel?
    There has to be charges for this.
    It’s in their own words and easy to verify with hotel. These losers don’t have jobs and have kids. Instead of raising their children they spend their time stalking people, setting people up and setting up smear campaigns.
    Someone step up and save these children.
    Great to have free state paid child care to run around being ratchets.
    I assume Mr. Jackson will not take the stalking lightly. Good luck in court for the next few years. Your new friend group won’t need you after Karen is found innocent.
    No one will give a shit that you are bled dry of any resources you have and are going to prison. No one! Maybe Grant.😂

  17. Are Karl and Jackie going to continue pouting with duck face through out trial? Don’t they have kids and jobs?
    I can’t look at chinless monkey face for 6 weeks.

  18. Anyone see Morrissey around lately?
    Not a chance he’s not drowning his fat face in gravy and whiskey.
    Clock is ticking guy. That closet – graveyard of skeletons is open and ready for exposure.
    Tick tick ….

    1. I see him at the gym almost every morning. He normally gets there right around 5:00 am.
      I admire his dedication to fitness.

  19. Oh dear Lizzie

    Your wonderful husband that you defend so rigorously has not only humiliated you in Canton its actually gone Global!!

    Did you find out he just ain’t that into you when Yannetti told the world or did he at least have the decency to give you a heads up??

    Kinda ironic what you post online about what people say about your husband.

    Will you be making a post about how appalled you are that he too said that he wanted Karen to kill herself??

    Will you be issuing an apology to all of those people whose Jobs you contacted for telling you the truth about your not so wonderful husband??

    Or will you be hiding in the same basement as Jill Daniels now that her wicked ways have also been exposed along with Jackie Two Chins and Sean McCabe??

    I have to say the company you keep ain’t looking too pretty and we’ve yet to get Jen McCabe on the stand along with her 911 call!!

    My best suggestion is that perhaps you go and get a house near the local prison in order to make your visitation visits to all of your buddies …..you know the ones that have all lied to your face …..and you bought it hook line and sinker!!

    Then again there’s a reason you too have a Criminal Defence Attorney…..can’t wait to find out how they all implicated you!!

    Hmmm Johns wet clothes stayed in your Hubby’s trunk for quite sometime ….I hope you didn’t do the laundry for him!!

    1. Naw, Lizzy will be cutting bait and getting outta Dodge, real soon. Stand By Your Man, maybe if he hadn’t embarrassed her globally.

  20. Again I ask:
    If this was a pedestrian hit by a car then why wasn’t the MSP accident reconstruction team called instead of the homicide team?
    Nobody talks about this.

    1. Actually, why was no required M/V Accident Report filed when supposedly a pedestrian was struck and killed by a Massachusetts motorist? Has ANYONE ever seen the written M/V accident report by the police in this case? Citation issued?? No accident reconstruction done which is also required? Why?

  21. Thanks TB
    Long days for you
    Appreciate the extreme effort
    Court + a full time job
    Light at the end of the tunnel (for this chapter) is in sight
    And it is bright

  22. I feel so bad for Karen. The fact she has to defend herself from these outlandish allegations while dealing with the trauma of not only losing her partner whom she deeply loved but finding him in such a horrible way and trying everything to save him is the worst possible thing to have to go through. My husband passed of a heart attack in his sleep last year and I woke up and found him and the trauma I have from that is life shattering and heart wrenching. I just can’t imagine having found him in the circumstances that Karen found John and then having to defend myself from outlandish allegations from the people who actually hurt him and took his life. She is by the most strong and graceful woman. I pray for her and his children to get the justice they deserve every night and for those who actually caused this to face accountability.

      1. Thank you, it’s been very difficult it changes your entire life in one moment. Like Karen I had to take a brief vacation to the hospital for my own sanity so my children wouldn’t lose both parents. I’ve been blessed to have a wonderful support system and am very active in grief therapy and support groups. Im coping as well as possible. I just can’t imagine going through what Karen has been going through on top of the loss. She truly is a warrior. I pray this nightmare comes to an end for her so she can finally move on and heal from all this trauma. My heart breaks for her.

  23. Yanetti’s opening clarified timeline and got evidence in record. Masterful. Does jury get transcript of dashcam audio. Lally it snowed, OK. How much accumulation was on Officer O’keefe? Is Harvey Leonard available? Patiently waiting Jackson’s close!

  24. Prediction: Karen gets acquitted as too many errors; no one else gets tried as too many errors and reasonable doubt by pointing out “Even the State thought it was someone else”. All involved are quietly asked to move on/resign from their official positions and a fallen policeman’s killer is never brought to justice. Too sad but I’ve seen it before.

  25. 2 things to note after speaking with someone who watched both days of the trial but had not previously followed the case:
    1. they are unsure of who was who in the dash cam video (we know because we have studied these people extensively, but they were still confused about who Jen and Kerry were and how to identify who was who in the dash cam video).. just sharing because we must remember that a juror potentially could be confused here as well. May be worth creating a visual that circles each person and explains Karen is the one with the lightweight black jacket and long hair. And driving the point home that Jen is the sister of the homeowner is very crucial, as again it can be confusing.
    2. they are unphased by the revelation of the ‘weather appropriate heavy puffy coat’.. (that took us by shock because we all know what John was wearing) but again.. the jurors probably have no idea. The mistake of referring to the puffy coat several times packs a lesser punch when you have no prior knowledge of how John was dressed in the first place. A visual of ‘he had these items on, and these items were entered into evidence, these items went missing, etc’.. would be helpful. We know the point Jackson was making about the coat, but not sure the jurors understood.
    *I know the defense will reiterate all of this in time since they dont miss a beat.. but just wanted to point it out as a first time listener described.

  26. I know this is absorbing alot of focus , for a distraction check out open mic at end of Canton Selectboard last night. Just priceless. Mic drop moment
    John Connelly, with all due respect, your a real scumbag. 👏

  27. I have read some excellent stuff here Definitely value bookmarking for revisiting I wonder how much effort you put to make the sort of excellent informative website

  28. I’m still reading through all of the “Canton Cover Up” blogs. I’m up to about part 119 now. I have to say that I was skeptical coming into this. From the mainstream media’s reporting it seemed like she accidentally hit him. I noticed a complete lack of any evidence one way or the other tho, so I started reading TB. I have to say that the way TB writes about this in absolutes was off putting at first. Because of this I was originally thinking he would just be sounding off for the defense and therefore wouldn’t be reliable. The huge amount of evidence kept me reading. Now at part 119 I’m completely convinced it was a coverup. The lengths to which the Commonwealth goes to deny the defense team evidence, the obvious cover up, the blatant lies told by the D.A. and others, the huge amount of circumstantial evidence, the conspirators’ complete refusal to answer questions, and the complete lack of evidence provided by the prosecution is undeniable. After watching the opening statements and first few witnesses I have to say that A.D.A. Lally’s convoluted, unrelated, questions are just time filler. There is no way he believes he can win this, so why take it all the way to trial. The only thing I can come up with is that if he dropped the charges that would be admitting that they were wrong, and there would be public outcry to arrest the true culprits. By going to trial and losing he can still pretend that Karen Read did it and just got off. It’s shameful the amount of corruption in this case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *