Canton Coverup Part 527: Commonwealth Intentionally Changed Episode Titles For Grand Jury, Deleted Evidence Sent To Them By Convicted Criminal Kate Peter

 

– Donate to the Turtleboy Legal Defense fund

–  Watch Framed 2 Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story

At yesterday’s motion hearing in the Turtleboy witness intimidation case, the defense showed for the first time that the Commonwealth repeatedly lied to the Grand Jury about the titles of shows that were used as evidence to indict me. Here is a list of all the titles of the videos presented by Ken Mello and Brian Tully at the Grand Jury on December 5, December 14, December 19, and December 20, along with their actual titles:

Grand jury testimony is sealed so we can’t share a PDF of the actual testimony. But we can say that Brian Tully testified under oath to the grand jury that the titles of the Turtleboy Live episodes he showed the grand jury were the titles given to them by the Commonwealth. For example:

“The next video is episode 598 ‘Life as normal is over’.”

The key word is “episode.” They could’ve said “exhibit” or even “video,” but they chose “episode,” which makes it sound like I gave it that title.

On top of that, they also announced to the grand jury that they had an entire folder entitled “intent.” Episode 595, which they said was titled “Can kick Colin Albert’s ass,” was from the Intent folder. Intent to obstruct or interfere with a trial is a requirement to charge someone with witness intimidation.

And they had an entire folder of folders they titled “intent” which they announced to the grand jury.

This is a huge deal.

Telling the grand jurors that episode 616 is titled “Commonwealth tells more lies about John O’Keefe’s GPS data” would give them the impression that I’m a journalist and my intent is exposing corruption in the government. Telling them episode 616 is titled “Trying to destroy Colin Albert’s life” gives them the impression that my intent is to destroy a witnesses’ life in order to prevent him from testifying in a trial.

Telling the grand jury that episode 604 is titled “Colin Albert drops out of school, Brian Higgins flipping?”, makes it sound like my intent is to report on Brian Higgins potentially making a deal with the government to testify against the McAlberts. Saying that the title of episode 604 is “I do not want this to go to trial” gives the grand jury the impression that my intent is to interfere with a criminal proceeding by doing whatever it takes to prevent the trial from happening.

Telling the grand jurors that the impromptu live stream on August 7, 2023 is entitled “Karen Read’s parents to go Boston 25 News and bombshell information,” makes it sound like my intent is to report on new information in the Karen Read case. Calling that same stream “Alberts should be afraid” makes it seem like my intent is to physically scare the Alberts with the intent of making them afraid to testify, and thus interfering with a trial.

Telling the grand jury that episode 618 is titled “Detective Bukhenik intimidates witnesses, Chris Albert seeks protection order,” makes it seem like my intent is to show that Bukhenik, one of the alleged victims in my case, is actually a bad person who intimidates witnesses. Calling it “no right to live peacefully” makes it sound like my intent is to harass witnesses lives in the hopes that they don’t testify and a trial never happens.

Calling episode 602 “fupasaurus, Jill Daniels, Karl Dugal, Taillight mystery, Liz Proctor” may give the grand jury the impression that I’m some sort of comedian who uses made up words like fupasaurus with the intent to make people laugh because I’m completely harmless. Calling it “enjoying watching witnesses squirm” suggests that my intent is to scare witnesses, presumably so they won’t testify which would interfere with a potential trial.

All of this creates prejudice against me. The Massachusetts Rules of Criminal Procedure state that indictments can be dismissed if a grand jury is prejudiced by being improperly influenced.

The titles assigned to the episodes that were shown to the grand jury are important for a number of reasons:

1. It gives the jurors the impression that I gave them the titles, not bad faith actors whose life mission it is to put me in jail.
2. It gives the jurors the impression that out of a 3 hour show, the title is what I feel best sums up the entirety of the episode.
3. It gives the jurors the impression that I am so proud of the quote in the title that I want the world to see it so that people will click on the videos.

Imagine presenting Shawshank Redemption to a group of people, then showing them one scene from it and saying the movie is called “Wife killer experiences first all male orgy with the Sisters.”

That’s basically the same thing. It’s a singular scene in a 2 hour movie. If you showed just that scene to a group of people they’d think it was gay softcore porn. It’s not representative of what the movie is actually about, and it’s certainly not the title of the video. The movie is about a man who redeems his life at Shawshank prison.

This is exactly what Tully and Mello did with my 2 hour shows – took a 10 second quote from a 2 hour show, isolated and played just that clip, and then lied to the grand jurors and told them that quote was the name of the show.

Jurors often act on emotion. If they hear that I titled videos “no right to live peacefully” or “Alberts should be afraid,” then they might think I’m a douchebag who deserves to be charged with a crime. But if they actually watch an entire 2 hour episode, and are presented with the actual title of the show, they might realize that there’s a much bigger picture they’re not being shown.

It wasn’t just at the grand jury either. In Robert Cosgrove’s opposition to our motion to dismiss is filled with “titles” of episodes that are not actually titles. He even refers to them as “aptly titled,” which could give Judge Doolin the impression that I gave the episodes those titles, and that Cosgrove believes those are appropriate titles for the shows. Cosgrove went so far to say that the “titles do them justice.”

It gets worse though. In the charging documents, which were read out loud in court at my arraignment on October 11, 2023, have the CORRECT titles in them:

Aidan Kearney Charging Documents 10-11-23

So why was Ken Mello using the correct titles on October 11, but using the new renamed titles on December 5 at the grand jury? Well, as it just so happens convicted criminal Katherine Peter sent Brian Tully an email on November 1, 2023 with the subject “AK quotes Re: quotes”. She sent him a link to videos with the following message:

“I will be updating this throughout the night so the document will have more in the morning. I will send over a dropbox folder with the corresponding downloaded video files. Let me know if clipping them down to the quotes would help.”

She admits in writing that she is the source of the videos, that presumably were presented to the grand jury. She admits that she is offering to clip them down to the quotes in the titles, which is exactly what happened at the grand jury. We can’t confirm that these were the exact videos shown to the grand jury because when you click on the link in the email you get this:

“The file you requested has been deleted.”

There is only one person who can delete videos from a Google drive – the person who sent them. This was the original link in the email she sent him: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://docs.google.com/document/d/14LDwFowS15sfBThOknSQ7-72LR5SX3vjqTSwyx49ImY/edit?usp=sharing__;!!CPANwP4y!SsIcI2HIsUOSBj-x-xteGhSs3hyERidsPbCVPkt5bCHrsy9SN7m-lq9WokBLYZ5BwDXAPdXcyr1Zh_N5XpdnLpM$

On October 25, 2023 she wrote another email with the same link:

“We are working on monitoring, transcribing and flagging comments Aidan Kearney is making on his public YouTube streams that may cross the line regarding continued witness intimidation. Below is the link to a Google Doc, where I have flagged potential violations (I’m not a lawyer or a cop so I’ve made the “net” pretty wide, and understand some of these things may not cross the line) along with transcription of the statements. If you click the corresponding links it will lead to the full video cued up at the relevant timestamp. I have not done last night’s video yet, as YouTube hasn’t generated a transcript yet, and I don’t have the patience to sit through another round of listening to his garbage and manually transcribing, but am hoping it generates soon, as last night was pretty outrageous. He lapses into language that is pretty pointed at the victims, even going so far as to say “you” when referring to them. He’s also pretty threatening towards you and others in your office. I’m hoping at minimum some of this could help the prosecutor in court tomorrow as Aidan fights to have the “no contact” order lifted so that he can safely resume terrorizing these innocent people.”

Tully, Cosgrove, and Mello don’t actually watch my 3 hour streams. Everything they’ve used against me has been sent to them by a psychopath who lost 2 of her 4 kids to the state after years of neglect and abuse. She edited the videos, clipped them, and then renamed them, all AFTER I was arrested but BEFORE I was indicted by the grand jury. Evidence of this was then destroyed by her.

In yesterday’s hearing Cosgrove said that when Kate Peter sends Brian Tully videos he has a policy of not clicking on them, but rather asks her for the URL of the video so that he can watch it for himself on the Internet. (23 minute mark)

Yet we do not have a single email from the 4,727 pages of Brian Tully emails we received in discovery, in which he does that. We do, however, have several emails of Yuri Bukhenik and Brian Tully thanking her for sending them videos.

If this was an honest prosecution going after someone they knew committed a crime, then there would be no reason for them to clip and edit my videos, and there would certainly be no reason for them to change the titles, lie to the grand jury about them, and then delete the evidence.

Stay tuned….