Canton Cover-Up Part 213: Live Shows Temporarily On Hold After Rulings From 2 Judges Showing They Don’t Understand How The First Amendment Works
Donate to the Turtleboy Legal defense fund
– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– Donate to the Karen Read Legal Defense Fund
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group
I made an announcement on social media Saturday that I would be holding off on doing any sort of live shows for a while. The fact of the matter is that the people who are prosecuting me are not doing so in good faith, as they have lied repeatedly throughout the charging documents and misrepresented things that I said. They are holding a 90 day jail sentence over my head if I violate the vaguely worded stay away orders, which prohibit any direct or indirect contact with “witnesses.” There are people out there who are so obsessed with my reporting, and so dedicated to shutting it down, that they listen to every word I say on the streams, in order to take quotes out of context in a bad faith attempt to charge me with violating the orders. These people are actively working with Brian Tully and the DA’s Office.
I am the father of two children, and I cannot risk missing Christmas with them if these same bad faith actors intentionally misinterpret my words again. Since the entire charging documents consist of quotes from live videos I posted, I have made the choice, for now, to keep my commentary in written publications. This will allow me to double check everything I write prior to publication.
Also influencing my decision is the fact that two judges this week showed that they have no respect for the First Amendment and will blindly believe anything police tell them. On Thursday Judge Krupp denied our motion to remove the stay away orders that prevent me from reporting on this case. On Friday Federal Court Judge Denise Casper (the judge who sentenced Whitey Bulger) denied a temporary restraining order against the Canton Police Department that would allow peaceful protesters to gather outside of Chris Albert’s pizza shop. Although I believe in time that higher courts will rule in our favor, these two rulings have made me realize that these lower court judges will believe whatever cops tell them.
The Krupp decision was outrageous, and we are discussing our options for appeal. Here it is in its entirety.
AK bail review full decision (1)
The lies and incorrect findings are numerous, so let’s go over them all.
- Elizabeth Proctor “otherwise has no role in the Read case,” and I encouraged people to leave negative reviews on her employer’s social media accounts.
Elizabeth Proctor contacted the workplaces of people who left negative comments about her husband’s corrupt behavior as the lead detective in the Karen Read case. In doing so she created a chilling effect because people were afraid to publicly express their views about a matter of public concern out of fear of economic injury. She therefore chose to play a role in the Read case. People are well within their rights to express their dissatisfaction with Instrom because they employ a woman who would behave like this. They also haven’t fired her, so there was no economic injury. Workplaces are contacted all the time by cancel culture mobs trying to get a person fired. The statute is effectively outlawing cancel culture, but only to family members of “witnesses.”
2. Judge Krupp cited out of context quotes that I made about John O’Keefe’s mother and brother, and used an out of context quote I gave to Boston Magazine.
The O’Keefes do not have stay away orders on me, and I have not confronted any of them in public. Krupp combines those quotes with the Boston Magazine quote and is clearly suggesting that I am only saying the things I say for entertainment purposes. However, when I saw the O’Keefe’s walking up the courthouse steps I encouraged other protesters NOT to boo them (which is on video). The only reason Krupp included these quote was to push the “Turtleboy bad” narrative, suggesting that I am so offensive in general that it’s OK to violate my First Amendment rights.
3. Judge Krupp claimed that I pressured witnesses to change their testimony, spoke to witnesses who told me they didn’t wish to speak with me, increased my viewership as a result of the Karen Read coverage, and didn’t adhere to “codes of ethics for journalists,” as defined by the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics.
My page views are completely irrelevant. The First Amendment doesn’t stop existing because a lot of people are reading the things that you’re saying, there isn’t a single witness who I tried to pressure to change their testimony, and the SPJ code of ethics is of no value in evaluating a journalist’s actions because their code is not the same as bar rules for lawyers.
4. Krupp claims that examples of “harassment” on my part include “veiled threats” and asking sarcastic and rhetorical questions to witnesses.
Asking sarcastic and rhetorical questions is not harassment, and there were no veiled threats.
5. Krupp claims that in my videos I have encouraged followers to threaten witnesses, by citing a quote I made about Brian Albert – who does not have a stay away order on me. He also included a quote I made about a confrontation that a woman had with Chris Albert in July.
He doesn’t articulate what these “veiled threats” are, and certainly doesn’t give any examples of me encouraging others to threaten witnesses because it never happened. Clearly I am not encouraging any threats to be made towards Chris Albert, since the woman I was discussing didn’t threaten him, and I articulated that I was not encouraging or directing their behavior.
6. Krupp admitted that the basis of his findings come from Brian Tully’s reports, and the video clips he viewed came from the Commonwealth.
I’ve alleged that Brian Tully is corrupt and lies constantly on reports. The fact that his report is the sole basis of the Judge’s decision is exactly the problem. We submitted the entire quotes in context, which Krupp apparently did not view.
7. An example cited by Krupp was this one about why people shouldn’t be afraid to come forward and tell the truth:
An atmosphere of fear and intimidation existed in Canton because people are afraid to testify against the Alberts. My reporting and activism have made people less afraid. Krupp proved my point for me by including this quote.
8. Krupp repeated the lie in his findings that I encouraged followers to order food from Chris Albert and not pay for it, which led to a vast increase in orders not being picked up.
We put in our reply that this literally never happened, and the government didn’t cite a particular show where I said it, because no such show exists. Judge Krupp chose to blindly believe a corrupt cop’s report, without any evidence, and used it as justification to limit my freedoms.
8. Krupp claims that Colin Albert was the target of harassment and intimidation on social media as a result of a voice mail I left mocking threatening statements he made toward rival gang members on social media.
But Colin Albert has no social media. He isn’t on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram, so our followers couldn’t harass or intimidate him online even if they wanted to. Krupp completely disregarded the fact that I was mocking Colin with the voicemail, not threatening him.
9. Krupp claims that I harassed witnesses by posting a list of her call log from a publicly available defense motion in the Read case.
It’s not witness intimidation to show the public a public document that any member of the public can see on their own.
10. Krupp claims that I harassed the witnesses when I videotaped into the home of Jennifer McCabe, published pictures of her children, and made comments directed at her sister Denise Galvin.
“You wanna f***ing dance? We can dance.”
These must be the “veiled threats.” However, that is not a threatening statement. If it is then McCabe’s attorney Kevin Reddington is also guilty of witness intimidation, since he told me that he wanted to dance with me on Facebook.
It’s not harassment to walk up to someone’s door and ring the doorbell while videotaping what is directly in front of you. They chose to keep their door wide open. Additionally, the pictures I posted of Jennifer McCabe’s children are pictures that she denies are actually her children.
11. Krupp blindly believed Tully’s lie that we walked on the Proctor’s front lawn and spit on their driveway during the Rolling Rally protest.
I arrived at the Proctor’s house at the 30:30 mark. It was so peaceful that I made note of the lemonade stand across the street and encouraged others to buy lemonade from them. At 31:20 I made note of the “turtle crossing” sign in the front yard (which showed that they thought they were mocking us), and at 31:30 I acknowledged the private property sign and said, “we cannot step foot on his property, which is fine.” At no point during our 7 minute stay does anyone walk on their lawn or spit on their driveway, nor do I direct anyone to do so. The footnote even states that we were all on the street.
12. Krupp made a factual finding that during the rolling rally I directed neighbors of the McCabes to pressure them to change their testimony.
But the quote Krupp cited was me telling the neighbors that the McCabes are cop killers (evidence shows they are), and that we weren’t going to let them get away with killing John O’Keefe. Nowhere do I encourage anyone to change their testimony.
13. Krupp claims I directed Julie Nagel’s neighbors to pressure her to change her testimony.
But he quotes me as urging Nagel to “tell the truth.” If Julie Nagel is already telling the truth then I’m not pressuring her to change her testimony. Is Krupp suggesting that Nagel is currently lying, and that it’s in the best interest of the administration of justice for her to keep on lying, rather than tell the truth? I certainly hope he’s not doing that.
14. Krupp said that the First Amendment does not authorize journalists to commit crimes.
In doing so he had already determined that I was guilty of committing the crimes I’m charged with.
15. Krupp claims that it’s not just my speech, but also my conduct that I’m being charged with. He cited the dancing comment, and the mocking of Colin Albert as examples of true threats because they are speech that was designed to encourage my followers to harass witnesses.
The “dancing” comment was directed at Denise Galvin, who is not a witness. I am not being charged for my “conduct,” just speech. I certainly never encouraged any followers to harass the witnesses. Krupp claims that all of this was “abusive theater,” once against suggesting that the purpose of my journalism isn’t to report the news, but to get clicks and views (which doesn’t matter). He cited the Brandenburg decision to suggest that courts can limit speech when its directed to incite imminent lawlessness. No such direction was given by me, so this is irrelevant.
16. Krupp reluctantly referred to me as a member of the press, but then said that my journalism wasn’t really journalism because I’m attempting to pressure witnesses to change their testimony.
Jennifer McCabe is not going to suddenly admit that she helped murder John O’Keefe and accept a lengthy prison sentence due to a peaceful rolling rally.
17. Krupp claims that my argument that I didn’t know what I was doing was illegal was baseless because it was “commonly accepted and understood” that I was harassing the witnesses.
Except the opposite is true. Two judges in Stoughton District Court both ruled that my conduct towards Jennifer McCabe and Chris Albert was not harassment. The statute is so vaguely worded that none of the 300 people at the peaceful rolling rally had any idea they were committing felonies.
In the federal case Judge Casper’s ruling makes no sense and clearly shows that she did not watch the video of what happened.
”]
Judge Casper ruled that it was “not clear” if the 9 peaceful protesters outside of D&E Pizza faced a credible threat of prosecution or arrest.
Yet she admits that the police gave protesters a copy of the witness intimidation statute, which states that those who violate the statute “shall be subject to criminal penalty.”
The police told these people that what they were doing was illegal, and according to the law if you keep doing this illegal thing you will be arrested. Yet Judge Casper says it is “not clear” if there was imminent threat of arrest.
The protesters were not arrested, but as the Judge pointed out, you have legally suffered injury merely by being threatened with enforcement of law.
Additionally, the protesters were denied access to the 911 call because there is an “ongoing investigation” into them, and the police have not denied that they might arrest them.
Clearly they are being threatened with arrest if they’re being investigated for violating the same law I was arrested for violating.
The Judge pointed out that it’s unconstitutional to ban “content based” speech.
But at the 3:32 mark Officer Zepf specifically cites the content of the protester’s signs (Free Karen Read, Colin Albert Was In The House) as being in violation of the statute.
The Judge herself cited this.
Judge Casper pointed out how the witness intimidation statute was designed to protect witnesses from being bullied to the point where they are too reluctant to testify.
Not a single person is scared to testify, nor is any of this designed to make them feel that way.
Judge Casper claims that it’s OK to shut down this protest because the protesters can protest elsewhere.
Except they can’t. Five Canton cops are witnesses as well, which prohibits protest outside of the police station. There is nowhere you can go in Canton that would keep you out of eyesight of a witness, potential witness, or family member of a witness.
The most outrageous statement was that the protest increased the risk that Chris Albert would change his testimony because it involved multiple participants.
So if it was one person it would be OK, but you can’t have multiple people. The Judge would have us believe that these 9 people were capable of influencing him to change his testimony and admit that his son killed John O’Keefe.
Judge Casper said that the police merely advised the protesters of the statute, but didn’t threaten to arrest them. However, she then went on to admit that the police intended to enforce the law if violated.
Somehow this judge concluded that the right to protest wasn’t chilled, despite the fact that she admitted that they had legitimate reason to assume they would be arrested if they continued to peacefully protest.
I don’t trust these judges, and I’m not putting my freedom in their hands. We will win this case in time, but I am of no use to my kids, John O’Keefe, Karen Read, or the millions of people following this story if I am in jail. I am more effective with my writing, and have used the power of the pen to take down powerful people for the last 10 years. I will continue to do so, and will not be deterred in the mission for truth and justice.
Perhaps … just perhaps … these JUDGES know more about law than you do? You’re becoming quite a joke. You are an adult man who calls himself “Turtleboy” and cried for his mommy when arrested.
No one gives a shit you aren’t having live shows. No one. You are insignificant. But, Yannetti, Read, and Jackson are probably scared shitless about their communications with you. The BBO will want to know if the lawyers sent you autopsy photos. They won’t be lawyers for long.
If he was that insignificant then why did they charge him with anything? Oh wait cuz he was/is effective. If there was any communication between him an her an her lawyers it would’ve been leaked already (kinda like how u said he cried for his mommy that gets leaked but not the important stuff you could do better). An no these judges don’t know or care enough to know about the 1st amendment. They prob have never had a case like this before. Question for you how do you know he cried? Please tell me an back it up with proof. Pics or it didn’t happen… Unlike the 5 undocumented searches from the Tailight whisperer or only geofencing for andriod when it’s known that John had Apple. Answer that an I’ll join your Cuck filled parties an show you how real men satisfy your wife… That’s what I thought not enough corners for all you Canton Cuck’s in a McAlberts houses for you all…
What? You made no sense. Read what you just wrote. Your teachers should be ashamed of themselves. Maybe “Turtleboy” was your teacher. He was fired and is a failed teacher so maybe that’s where you learned your writing. But hey I’m sure you uneducated folks know more about the law that the judges do. Keep on spewing your idiocy.
AWESOME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Shut up Chris. Isn’t there some shitty pizza to spin?
Do you really blame people for not coming to pick up that swill?
He’s so insignificant that you’re here commenting a whole ass novel lmfao foh loser
I understand two paragraphs may be more than you’ve read ever and is a novel to you. I’m proud of you for reading.
I understand that exaggeration to getting a point across isn’t something you comprehend, bitchboy. Why not use your real name? You too afraid to put your name on shit?
Point being you’re a pussy and you wish you could be TB, but the reality is even your own family hates you and you’ll never amount to anything but the guy that literally everyone laughs at and makes fun of. If you had a less than sad existence on this planet, you’d have better things to do than comment on a website manned by the person you hate oh so much! It’s pathetic, and no one cares about the drivel you spew because you have zero credibility anyway. Have a good life chomo!
Perhaps your mother should have had an abortion!! See your mistaken turtles life for your own. No one loves or cares about you. Pussy
FYI. These judges don’t write these opinions. Their clerks do the writing and the judges review and sign off on them.
Hey Sean, you realize every time you post, there’s something called an IP Address, and it can be tracked…to you?
“But, Yannetti, Read, and Jackson are probably scared shitless about their communications with you. The BBO will want to know if the lawyers sent you autopsy photos. They won’t be lawyers for long.”
Perhaps, just perhaps one day you can go back writing op-eds for Gawker, Jezebel or the Dorchester Reporter. Asshats like you are why the Globe won’t allow anyone to comment without signing in. Your statists tropes are about as entertaining as Amy Schumer’s fat pussy stand up gag.
Go start a substack, volunteer at a soup kitchen, lie and say your going to Ukraine or end up a punch line in a Sam Hyde Livestream already.
Keep writing. They can’t take it out of context when the blogs and writings clearly exist. Second, it is continually sad how brutally mediocre these judges are. For what they get paid, they can’t reason, think clearly or do their jobs correctly. And they base their conclusions on the testimony of corrupt cops? Biased people like Proctor’s wife? It’s okay for her to call and harass people but no one else can do it? It defies common sense but isn’t surprising given how thick as thieves the cops and judges are. They will side with each other and close ranks 99% of the time.
These judges are the D&E chicken parm of the legal profession.
These judges are like the rest of the spineless people lining up with this cover up. There is too much to lose if the truth is treated like the truth here. Every criminal that has been convicted by these dirty cops, DAs and judges will have their cases thrown out and retried. How much does that cost the taxpayers of Massachusetts and how many of these scumbag cops, DAs and judges survive what would happen if the truth were to be treated like the truth?
Honestly this is why a change of venues should be requested by Aidans attorney. It needs to be moved to a completely different unrelated courthouse where there are no biased cops or judges or DAs
If this was a few years ago, i wouldn’t have any qualms about you and others continuing to exercise your Rights to Free Speech.
We are now living in a Police State. Terrorists can protest, burn down building, assault citizens they don’t agree with and the courts do nothing. Illegal aliens are being flown in, supported, housed, given cash for clothing, entertainment on the tax payers dime,the court and military does nothing. Our Atty General encourages us to report our neighbors for idling their cars, buying gas stoves or using gas leaf blowers. People blindly line up and get injected with an experimental drug that is killing and disabling many.
The head of the CCP is welcomed to the state of California while the government is making sure the homeless citizens are shoved off into a gutter somewhere else. Imagine the cost of securing and cleaning up for Xi’s visit?
Aidan, do not trust that these treasonous bastards won’t continue to lie and twist everything you write or say. They are trying to silence you because of the facts you speak of. Dinesh D’Souza’s movie isn’t fiction…it is happening right here, right now.
I don’t know who will protect and stand beside us to save our Country? The military took an Oath to protect We the People and The Constitution. Where are they? People say vote the liberals out of office in Nov 2024. By then I feel we won’t be having any fair elections, if elections are allowed at all.
Be cautious and follow your lawyers advise. God Bless you! ❤️
We all know you haven’t threatened anyone Aiden, but this is a zero sum game for them. Like all tyrannical politicians and public officials (I didn’t say they are all tyrants) they are all in on this fight. The legacy media has been unmasked as the ministry of propaganda, the DOJ and approved proxy organizations are the modern day Brownshirts.
There are a lot of patriots who are willing to stand up with you and for you. Many patriots who just need leadership. Like it or not you’ve stepped forward as a leader. God bless you in this very real battle of good vs evil. This is one battle in a war that none of us want but must fight in order to save our republic. For our children and grandchildren. Never lose hope, and remember Jesus has paid for our sins and we will be saved. Remember to love one another, and keep your heart open to gods grace.
Hamas touted their last free election….back in 2007. Anyone whom thinks it can’t happen here is going full ostrich: head in the sand.
Keep your powder dry.
There’s a rumor that the grown man that calls himself “Turtleboy” had a 3some with Brett and Leigha. Afterwards, TB felt some kind of way because Brett’s back shots were preferred by Leigha and TB had some kind of stage fright which dampened his ability to penetrate.
How sad your life is. Sitting and waiting for him to post something. You are all obsessed with Aidan. It’s quite disturbing.
That’s pretty rich. This adult who calls himself “Turtleboy” and thinks he is a “journalist” attacks people every day. Time for the rational and intelligent people to go on the offensive. He’s driving a Lexus given to him by the defense team. They’ve offered him a way to support his unemployed ass. He has failed in every possible aspect of life. He lives in his basement. His wife lives upstairs. He is a nobody and is using this to try to get with the defendant and make money. But hey, hitch your wagon to him. Good for you.
Well, the alternative is believing the states bull shit case against Karen. So I guess we’ll all stick with Aidan and support him. Best of luck getting those kids back Kate. Keep up the good work.
“that’s pretty rich” 🤮
don’t even need to read the comment
I highly doubt Bret can even get it up. He’s old and frail and I heard he’s more into dudes. Could he even last one minute before being out of breath and coughing up a lung, and maybe dying? Nah. Nice try though!
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I hate to break it to you. That’s not how the government works by process. And……..the First Amendment just like the Second has been destroyed by judicial activism and bureaucratic jurisprudence.
– See Douglas Mackey
– See Sarah Palin defamation lawsuit
– See Derek Chauvin’s conviction (medical examiner)
– See Conrad Black (measurably overcharged)
– Dad in Ohio who reported his 11 year old daughter was propositioned then told by the female cop she could be arrested.
It’s not what or why, but who/whom. I noticed the police in the Tony Timpa case were not held liable on criminal charges but could be on civil (they will keep their jobs though). It’s time for people to get away from the system that allows this.
First, let’s talk about Kevin Reddington and how just about everyone he gets hired to defend is a scumbag… Hearing that Jen McCabe hired him was in line with what I’ve always thought of him. What surprises me is that the family of Lindsay Clancy hired him.. WHY would you hire that guy? It’s like you want to see her get convicted by hiring him.
Most of us, including myself, have held law enforcement in high regard. We think of them as having a calling to protect and to serve. It’s sort of ingrained in us to respect them and think of them as the authority. I know for me that has all changed because of this case. I realize that there are officers out there that are corrupt, unethical and dishonest and get away with it because of the culture of the workplace. There is a real fear among others that they can’t speak up. That’s a shame and that needs to change.
Thanks to the Canton Police, Proctor, Yuri and Tully for letting the rest of us just how bad the corruption is.
Cops get on the stand and lie every day. Ask anyone who ever divorced a cop about the cop culture of dishonesty. Lying is encouraged among police, it’s a tactic.
Judges are worthless, lazy and arrogant a rubber stamp for prosecutors.
You have to hope for an old time liberal civil rights judge or a new age conservative freedom first judge.
If good cops existed they would stop the bad cops but they don’t stop them they cover for the dirty cops.
There are plenty of good cops. Unfortunately, we only hear about the bad ones from the media as that is what draws the viewers and readers in. I come from a family of law enforcement officers. They are good guys, they do a lot of great things for the communities they serve protect daily, you just don’t hear about it… That’s not “news” unfortunately. Now, these cops involved in this case, are not good cops by any means. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Please take a breath and try to be open to what I’m about to say;
Police Officers (the title “cop” is earned, even amongst police officers) are not ALL bad. Something in life has caused you to comment on what is truly the human condition. There is no category/ profession that is truly ALL BAD. Except maybe human trafficker , cult leader, child pornographer. That said I’m not about to discredit your perspective, only ask that you consider others. I’m a retired COP from a large New England city. I retired a few years ago. I’ve been following this story since Aiden first wrote about it. I promise you I am very disturbed by the facts of this case and I’m worried about the implications for all of us. So are EVERY retired and active cop I know who are also looking on. I also promise you that I, like other cops I choose to call brothers, were called to the profession. Called out of love for my fellow Americans and community. I’m also a veteran. I served you, my brothers and everyone else who calls themselves Americans. I served out of love. A love that I still have. I regret serving the US and Massachusetts government. I will never regret serving Americans and the citizens of Massachusetts. I served with many great men and women, better than me. They shared a love of god, country and of YOU! I would have, and still would give my life for this love and in the act of defending YOU and any other American who cannot defend themselves. I’m sorry if you truly believe none of us are good because that surely means you’re heart is full of darkness and doubt. I promise there are many people like me who have love in their hearts and are righteous in deed and belief. And they are COPS, a title once earned is until death.
You know your wife is going to finally get that divorce when you go to jail. You’re just delaying the inevitable, you will do time, you will be someone’s prison wife. You will get the divorce papers while you’re sitting behind bars. I hope your wife ends up with gianetti. He might be a loser but at least he’s not a lying scumbag that’s definitely going to jail
You need new drivel.
You have no clue about anything if you think Gianetti is honest and doesn’t have jail in his future.
Some advice for Aidan and anyone else reading through the posts. Ignore some of the trolls that go off topic and try to either bring up unrelated items, made up items, and /or just try to create a lot of noise.
What is obvious is that the Canton Crew of the Alberts and McCabes are desperate and they have some very pathetic people that they have reeled in to create some chatter. We need to all ignore it and stick to the facts of the case and the facts of the Karen Read Case tell us that she is innocent and being framed by Brian Albert, Jen McCabe and others.
Keep the faith too. Something BIG may be happening SOON.
Great advice, it’s all nonsense anyway, what they spew is never back up with facts! Clearly it’s pathetic nonsensical bullshit, the very definition of a troll. Imagine going onto a website of a person you despise and reading it everyday just so you can troll the comments and argue with people that don’t care about what you have to say!
I truly hope Canton votes for an audit, the shit that will uncover! The fact these people are pushing hard not to be audited is VERY TELLING! If they were the good people they try to convince people they are you would think they would BEG FOR AN AUDIT, so after they can put this all to rest! But just like the McAlberts, the truth will not set them free.
Yes, isn’t it amazing how many people don’t want an audit, fight to not hand over evidence, never present their side of the story and only use the police to weaponize their intimidation and name-calling out on public streets. THIS is NOT the way innocent people with nothing to hide behave! And it all started when Jen McCabe never banged on any neighbor’s door begging for help and Brian Albert never came out of the house. From that moment on, they’ve done everything to hide – because they knew the truth of how John died.
Urging witnesses to tell the truth = threatening and intimidating witnesses to get them to change their statements. Makes sense 🙄🙄🙄
We think we have rights, we don’t. Keep up the good fight.
Inflict “emotional injury” hurting someone’s feelings is a crime now.. welcome to America the land of the snowflakes
It’s pretty clear that someone doesn’t understand how the First Amendment works. The reason libel and defamation laws work so well is because the First Amendment is not absolute; one is held accountable for what they say. You’re now being held accountable.
(I can see TB shudder at the word “accountable”).
No, the judges aren’t lying, they just didn’t buy into your lawyer’s arguments that the whole thing is being taken out of context. Especially Krupp, who tortured himself by watching your Live shows onYouTube and discovered that, yeah, that context argument is bullshit.
It’s almost as if your legal point of view has been developed entirely by speaking with Boozie Suzie and that flapdoodle DeLaguna/Hayden. Listening to them was probably a poor decision on your part (one bad decision in a string of many, many poor choices).
What were the judges exact words regarding the claims to context within the live shows?
As for your Live Show: good riddance. And let’s be clear: you stopped at Bradl’s frantic insistence, not of your own accord.
A good 30% was usually you ranting about Kate or reliving some minor victory from the past, like Al Bundy recalling his glory days as a high school football player. The rest was usually repetitive nonsense about Canton, taking the smallest of facts (“Chris Albert once smoked a joint”) and turning it into some exaggerated bullshit (“Chris Albert is addicted to marijuana!”).
Sheer fuckery, that’s all it was. Throw in the sycophants cheering you on in chat (Boozy Suzie and Deb “Minor Criminal, Major Deadbeat” Z being the worst offenders) and it was a weird Internet sideshow. It won’t be missed.
Cheer up, though: your written words are very much under examination now as well (as are some interesting chat transcripts, you poor bastard).
Why did you watch it then and feel the need to voice it here?
These decisions will likely be reversed upon appeal. Unfortunately, litigation is costly and time consuming. The Commonwealth has virtually unlimited resources so the scales of justice are weighted in its favor from the start. Once exonerated, KR and TB should have grounds for civil suits against the corrupt individuals.
Should. But not likely. I’m sorry to say this but it usually doesn’t work like that.
Krupp is a Duval Patrick nominee and Casper is an Obama nominee. They are both very Liberal assholes. Liberals only care about free speech for the things they believe in. 2020 riots in the streets, Liberals called it peaceful protests. The US Judicial system is a joke, Liberals ruin everything they touch. Massachusetts State Police is nothing more than AAA with a badge, COSPLAY for adults. They don’t wear uniforms, they wear costumes. To many people understand that John OKeefe’s arm wounds are from a dog attack.
when this is all washed out I look forward to the many posts about how retahded these judges are.
“The night O’Keefe died”. Didn’t he die the next morning?
they continue to make this situation worse for themselves. you get arrested for something you said, but the mafia can assault us, take away our freedom and/or make our lives a living hell. that’s fair. people are watching. people are waiting to see just how far they take this retaliation. this is unheard of.
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.