Canton Coverup Part 330: Commonwealth Files Dozens Of Motions Preventing Karen Read From Defending Herself Or Mentioning FBI Investigation
Donate to the Turtleboy Legal defense fund
– Framed – Video for Full Background on Canton Cover-Up Story
– Donate to the Karen Read Legal Defense Fund
– See all parts of the Canton Cover-Up Series
– Watch the Live Shows and Videos
– Join ”Justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read” FB Group
The Commonwealth filed a plethora of motions yesterday that make it clear that they intend on asking Beverly Cannone to assist them in the coverup of John O’Keefe’s murder. In summation, they are effectively asking the court to prevent Karen Read’s entire defense and ignore the fact that the investigation itself is under federal investigation. Here are some of the insane things they are asking of the court in their last desperate appeal to obstruct justice:
The commonwealth wants to ban Karen Read from using a third party culprit defense. This is the only motion that is not readily viewable for the public to read.
Karen Read’s entire defense is third party culprit, because third parties are undeniably the people who murdered John O’Keefe. This is a perfectly permissible defense used often in criminal cases, but we can’t see what shenanigans Michael Morrissey is trying to pull because they’re hiding it from us.
The Commonwealth wants to prevent cross examination of witnesses about their alleged bias because it’s “harassment.”
In other words, they don’t want the defense to be able to ask Michael Proctor and Michael Lank about their close association with “witnesses” who would otherwise be considered suspects. This theme of framing legitimate questions as “harassment” is basically the entire basis for the bogus witness intimidation charges against me.
They don’t want the defense to be able to bring up the fact that Michael Proctor is under Internal Affairs investigation, or reference the fact that Michael Lank was sued for assaulting and falsely arresting the Lopilato brothers in order to help out his close friend Chris Albert after he got into a bar fight with them.
They know how horrible it’s going to look that their lead investigator is being investigated for lying to a grand jury in this very same murder investigation. It will make it impossible to convict Karen Read, and since their objective is to lynch her they want the facts about Proctor to be kept from the jury.
They don’t want the defense to be able to mention the fact that the FBI is conducting an investigation into the State Police and DA’s investigation into the murder of John O’Keefe.
The Commonwealth falsely claims that the results of the federal investigation “are consistent with the Commonwealth’s theory of the case and debunk the defendant’s allegations of a coverup.” They also claim that the defense communicated with the US Attorney’s Office and provided evidence that advanced Karen Read’s third party culprit theory.
Except the results of the federal investigation are not consistent with the Commonwealth’s theory AT ALL!!! We know from our limited understanding of what has already been revealed that the FBI specifically said that John’s injuries were not consistent with being struck by a car. The entire basis of the Commonwealth’s case is that John was struck by a car driven by Karen Read. This is the exact opposite of “consistent.”
The results of the federal investigation also show that Jennifer McCabe Googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27 AM, which backup the defendant’s theory of the case, rather than debunk it.
Oh, and then there’s the FBI finding that the DA’s Office told Brian Albert and Brian Higgins to destroy their phones. They really don’t want a jury to hear about that, because then they might start asking questions about the integrity of the DA’s Office, which would make it more difficult to lynch Karen Read.
My favorite is when they accuse the feds of working with the defense and suggest that it makes the DA’s Office the victim of conspiracy. The feds wouldn’t waste 18 months of time and resources on an investigation into public corruption if there wasn’t evidence to back it up. The fact that this evidence came from the defense means nothing. The feds aren’t stupid or easily fooled. If Karen Read’s team gave them nonsense and conspiracy theories that weren’t backed by evidence then the feds wouldn’t allocate the resources they have to this investigation. The Commonwealth is just butthurt that they were left out of the investigation because they are more than likely the target.
The Commonwealth also seeks to prevent the defense from bringing up the fact that witnesses gave inconsistent statements to the state and federal grand juries.
Michael Proctor told the state grand jury he didn’t know the McAlberts. He told the federal grand jury he did. The Commonwealth can’t have their star witness and lead investigator look like a liar in front of the jury because it would make it harder to lynch Karen Read.
Of course they had to file a motion about Turtleboy too. They surprisingly asked for all mentions of yours truly to be excluded from the trial, which at first I thought was odd.
Then I saw “blog postings.” They don’t want the defense to be able to introduced Part 161 of the Canton Coverup series because it’s the only online publication that has shown proof of Jennifer McCabe’s personal relationship with the Proctor family, after we caught her parking her car at their house.
They don’t want the jury to know about any misconduct or bad character from their witnesses.
Because God knows they all have plenty of both.
Instead of focusing on the evidence, which clearly indicates John was not run over by a car, the Commonwealth wants the jury to instead focus on Karen’s behavior on a New Years Eve Aruba trip.
I said this on the show last night and I’ll say it again – this is just a case of “bitches be crazy.” Sometimes women get fired up and accuse you of some stuff you didn’t do when they’re mad. It doesn’t make Karen Read a killer, and it doesn’t explain why John had dog bites on his arm.
Both sides want the jury to go to 34 Fairview Road.
This is a fatal mistake for the Commonwealth. Anyone who’s been there can see how much smaller and wide open that lawn is in person. There is no way you could possibly miss a 217 pound body lying 12 feet from the curb. Yet every single person inside the house, along with plow driver Lucky Loughran, failed to see John lying there when they left or drove by the house.
The Commonwealth intends to call John’s children, who have been completely brainwashed by the McAlberts, and wants to be able to ask them leading questions.
Karen did more for those kids than any of the people who are currently raising them and allowing them to grow up around the people who killed their adopted father/uncle. The fact that they’re using children like this is disgusting, but not surprising.
They also want to have their Cellebrite expert recreate Jennifer McCabe’s 2:27 Google search.
I’m here for it. I for one, cannot wait to watch the Commonwealth pull a self own by proving that Jen McCabe did in fact Google “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27 AM when she told police that John was home sleeping.
A lot of people are worried about this, but lawyer I’ve spoken with don’t think there is a world where even a judge as corrupt as Auntie Bev allows a motion that prevents Karen Read from using a third party culprit defense. But the mere fact that they’re so afraid of this happening shows that they know how weak their case is.
FYI Lally: It should be humiliating to have to answer why you searched “hos long to die in cold”.
I see lally is wearing his brown pants more.
As he should…no one wants to see Lally’s shit-stains on the back of a cream-colored suit. I know the jury won’t appreciate it.
Erm…. “leading” questions are taboo, so I thought. Leading questions is essentially coaching witness on what and how to respond.
On direct exam leading questions are definitely taboo. However MA courts make exceptions in certain cases. The main exception occurs on charges of SA involving young children. For young children we’re talking 5 years or younger. Children that young don’t do well with open narrative questions, esp not related to traumatic experiences.
That’s entirely different than teenagers testifying about an overheard phone call or disagreement between 2 adults. If either can’t handle open questions they probably shouldn’t be testifying.
They’re trying everything to help put her away . Because they all know she has done nothing wrong. So , it’s a last ditch effect to see what they can do to save this case they’ve wasted the Commonwealths money . And reaching for the stars . Well it’s starting to feel like a landmine. And there are trip wires everywhere where they step . So they have to do something to help their case , Against a woman who did nothing wrong but worry about her boyfriend not being home at 4:30 am when she woke after dropping him off at midnight .
Lunchbox and Meatball are fighting themselves right about now .
We have 5 days to see how truthful usao was about not letting this go-to trial.
Beverly Cannone might just be willing to go down with this trainwreck of a prosecution. It certainly appears as if she is. Let’s see how committed she is. She knows the feds are laser focused on the Commonwealths corruption in every aspect of this prosecution and all the deviant behavior of the MSP, CPD and NCDAO. Her enabling behavior of this clearly illegal prosecution will not be tolerated by the US Attorney and hopefully the SJC and Mass AG. The rope was there for Bev to use as a lifeline or a noose. Let’s see what she uses it for. Lady Justice is blind? Let’s see if she’s stupid.
Someone should make a chart with two columns — left side ahowing motions denied by Canone, right side quoting FBI report showing how that request was later vindicated…
Joe was about to learn, that in the future, justice was not only blind, but had become rather retarded as well-iduocracy top 10 best movies ever and accurate prediction of what things are like now.
That’s from idiocracy justice is not only blind but stupid
I think if Cannone permits any of these, the Feds bust in. Well, I hope they stop this circus before it starts, waiting for them to act is getting old. Hey Lizzy, you’re still a total twat, can’t wait to the destruction of your pos husbands career in real time. Hope instron pays you well, you’re gonna need it. Actually I hope they fired you, cunt.
I was better than you. In fact I’m the best tender of all time
While I liked and respected Mr Brodeur, Ken Dryden is my pick for best of all time. Now get lost and find your own schtick, I’m the old school goalie guy
Lighten up, Francis. You wanna go old school, this Russian Red Army tender was better than any name you dropped. NHL, Brodeur single-handedly won multiple cups. Patrick Roy is #2 on the list, followed by Dominick Hasek. Now for me playing with your schtick, even I, real life was better than you. That’s a fact, Jack
I pay homage to the goalies I like, at no point did I say any were the best except for KD. Clearly reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit. Opinions are like assholes, everyone has em, and some really stink. What you state as facts are just your opinions, they aren’t facts. I really DGAF who you think is the best, if I did, I would have asked.
Lol. Butthurt grown ass old fogie stomping and pouting because well, you’re a sensitive beta. No wonder you’re single.
I don’t think some ruski goaltender is going to save Cuntown, Uncle Rico
Agreed. Not even Martin Brodeur The God of All Goalies can save that cesspool of corruption.
Yeah Lizzy you’re a super cunt and everyone hates you.
They were all coached to push the disgruntled girlfriend angle.
No way Auntie Bev throws away her pension and forever free health insurance for the Canton Clan Bet on that. A state hack will always choose the hackdom over the dreaded private sector, always. If the McAlberts and the Norfolk DA are hoping for Auntie Bev to throw herself off the cliff for them, well, they bet on the wrong pony.
At some point, people should be writing to Mass elected officials to request that they take a stand. They, too, need to voice opinions on this matter and oppose injustice within the judicial system. It makes no sense that DA office would oppose the highly relevant FBI investigation. They are supposed to be seeking Justice — truth.
Auntie Bev & third party defenses: Mass SJC has held that criminal defendants have a constitutionalcright to put on a 3rd party defense.
It’s not unlimited; there has to be some evidentiary connection between the crime & a third party. In one case where SJC rejected the defense, all the defendant had put forward as a 3rd party was some serial killer known to be active in the US about the same time.
I think the defense is safe on 3rd party. Also on the Bowden evidence (evidence that the police investigation was royally fubar) even though the SJC hasn’t ruled that there is a similar constitutional right to present Bowden evidence.
This is absolutely unbelievable! Either the cw has put in a fix with the feds or they are a hell of a lot dumber than I thought.
If Aunty Bev allows the cw motions and the feds are actually going to intervene, she better kiss her retirement years bye bye. Is she really that stupid?
Are the feds going to stop this trial? Or is this going to be another hunter biden laptop fiasco?
Karen’s attorneys must be livid!
Material evidence is nonexistent because polycarbonate taillights on a Lexus SUV do not shatter, no human DNA exists because Officer O’Keefe entered Fairview house fully intact and was not hit by Ms. Read’s Lexus outdoors. Time’s up
Ms. Read must be fully exonerated in Norfolk District Court.
Then begin a competent investigation of Officer O’Keefe’s death by assault and battery and criminal negligence at a later date.
What a disgusting bunch. It’s ironic that they filed all these bogus motions on the day of OJ’s death.
Nordberg: “Heroin Frank, heroin.”
Frank Drebin: “That’s a pretty tall order, Nordberg. But I’ll see what I can do.”
Come on, Levy, if the taillights don’t fit, you must acquit. Let’s go!
FBI investigation exonerates Ms.Read. The negligence of law enforcement, and the blatant cronyism of a nonexistent investigation by MSP is an undeniable coverup of the tragic death of Officer John O’Keefe. Why?
Yanetti seriously said don’t cite the finny case law to me witch. I was there when it was written.
Hello, you’ve done a fantastic job. I’m sure my friends will find it helpful, so I’ll check it out and tell them about it.
Your blog is a happiness factory, and I’m grateful for the joy it produces. Thank you!