Law and Order

Judge Cannone Declares Mistrial In Michael Chesna Murder Trial After Allowing Courtroom To Turn Into A Zoo

 

Judge Beverly Cannone announced this morning that the Michael Chesna and Vera Adams murder trials have ended in a mistrial.

As we mentioned in a story published Friday, this is the direct result of Judge Cannone’s failure as a jurist, and Michael Morrissey’s failure as a District Attorney. This was a slam dunk case. The defendant killed 2 people in broad daylight and doesn’t deny doing so. It took Morrissey’s office 5 years to even bring this simple case to trial, ignoring the pain they were putting the families through. Cannone allowed the courtroom to turn into a zoo by:

  • Agreeing to impanel a jury from Worcester County that would have to agree to be bused in every day for a month during the summer, which severely limited the potential jury pool and disqualified otherwise qualified jurors.
  • Allowing jurors to come to court every day dressed in pajamas, setting a tone that this was not a serious matter, and thus they did not treat it as one (one juror was dismissed for asking out a court officer).
  • Refusing to allow the jury to hear critical evidence that might lead them to convict the defendant.
  • Instructing family members and witnesses not to show emotion in the courtroom while emotional testimony was discussed.
  • Banning police officers from wearing uniforms in court or displaying a thin blue line insignia (something she readily allows at Karen Read’s hearings).
  • Refusing to give jurors transcript of expert testimony that they had already heard in order to review it and determine a verdict, thus expecting them to thoroughly remember every piece of information that they had heard over a 4 week period.
  • Taking a week off during the middle of the trial.
  • Allowing one juror to hold the jury hostage by refusing to participate in deliberations, and sending them home early on Friday.

Judge Cannone is an incompetent, boorish, arrogant woman with an affinity for protecting murderers. It’s what she’s gone out of her way to do repeatedly in the Karen Read legal proceedings, and it’s what she did in the Emmanuel Lopes’ trial. She acts like this because she knows it is nearly impossible to remove a rogue judge like her.

To make matters more complicated the entire process will restart on July 21. Karen Read has a hearing in that same courtroom on July 25. Criminal trials are held from 9-1 and Read’s hearing is scheduled for two, so it should not affect that.

Judge Cannone is no longer the assigned judge to the main courtroom in Superior Court as well. However, she has the ability to insert herself as the judge if she chooses. It’s unclear if she will.

It’s unclear if the new jury will be picked from Norfolk County, but there’s no reason it shouldn’t be. We have Internet in Worcester County and are just as familiar as resident of Norfolk County about the police officer being killed in Weymouth. But if they were going to choose a jury from Worcester County then the trial should’ve been held in Worcester. Forcing jurors to sit on a school bus for a 3 hour back and forth ride to Dedham every day severely limited the jury pool.

This is a complete failure of the justice system, and Michael Morrissey and Judge Cannone should both resign over it. The DA’s Office had 5 years to prepare a case to prove that a man did something that he readily admits to doing. They lost to a public defender. This is the same DA’s Office that is wasting their time and resources, which could’ve been spent on the Chesna trial, attempting to build a ridiculous case against a woman (Karen Read) who they know as a fact is completely innocent. Imagine if they spent half the time into covering for Jen McCabe and Brian Albert as they did trying to get justice for John O’Keefe and Karen Read.

The role of a judge is similar to the role of a referee in a basketball game. If a ref does not blow their whistle early and establish command of the game then players will start fouling harder and fights will eventually break out. The ref will lose control of the game, and that’s their own failure, not the players.

Judge Cannone allowed her courtroom to turn into a 1980’s Detroit Pistons game.

When you step into a courtroom the judge should give everyone in court the aura that they are in charge. They should command respect and a sense of authority through their tone and presentation. Judge Cannone speaks in a soft tone that almost sounds as if she’s whispering. She gives the impression to observers that she doesn’t want to be there and has better places to be. She looks like someone you’d see at last call complaining about her losing Keno tickets, and asking to bum a cigarette.

No wonder jurors felt comfortable dressed in pajamas.

If Cannone commanded respect then there is no way a rogue juror would feel empowered to hold up the proceedings the way they did. The juror was repeatedly crying and refused to participate. A judge should never allow someone to disrespect their court like that. If this juror was too emotionally immature to handle a murder case without breaking down then she should be replaced. There were two more alternates available.

If you were one of the other jurors in this trial you are free to talk about what happened. I urge any of the other 13 remaining jurors to email me at [email protected] to tell us about what was going on in the deliberation room. I would be happy to name and shame the juror that did this, and do a deep background search on them. I express my deepest condolences to the Chesna and Adams families that they were further victimized by the failures of this court, and welcome them reaching out as well. This is a free country, and you have the right to speak your mind, regardless of how much it offends Michael Morrissey and Beverly Cannone.

P.S. Will WCVB legal analyst Greg Henning be criticizing Cannone for her failures? Probably not, considering she just did him a solid by allowing his motion to prevent his client Brian Albert from testifying, and then cancelling an evidentiary hearing the day before it was scheduled to be held.

 

 

Hello Turtle Riders. As you know if you follow Turtleboy we are constantly getting censored and banned by Facebook for what are clearly not violations of their terms of service. Twitter has done the same, and trolls mass reported our blog to Google AdSense thousands of times, leading to demonetization. We can get by and survive, but we could really use your help. Please consider donating by hitting the Donation button above if you'd like support free speech and what we do in the face of Silicon Valley censorship. Or just buy our award winning book about the dangers of censorship and rise of Turtleboy:  Qries

15 Comments

  1. Absolutely disgusting what she allowed to happen in that courtroom. My deepest sympathy to the Chesna & Adam’s Families.

  2. Judge Bev is the inspiration for the Iron Maiden Number Of The Beast album cover… allegedly.

    • Agreeing to impanel a jury from Worcester County – the goal is to have an unbiased jury and if the defendant requested it, that had to be considered. Also, judges tend to favor ruling for the defense on motions like this because it avoids a conviction being overturned on appeal (e.g. Aaron Hernandez rulings were all in his favor prior to his conviction).
    • Allowing jurors to come to court every day dressed in pajamas….. – Courts rarely have strict dress codes. It is what it is.
    • Refusing to allow the jury to hear critical evidence that might lead them to convict the defendant – If the evidence is not permitted under the Mass Rules of Evidence, it cannot come in. To allow it would create appealable error and the defendant could walk as a result.
    • Instructing family members and witnesses not to show emotion in the courtroom while emotional testimony was discussed – not uncommon so as to avoid creating jury bias.
    • Banning police officers from wearing uniforms in court or displaying a thin blue line insignia (something she readily allows at Karen Read’s hearings – there’s a difference between a jury trial and a hearing. Just because judges are letting the spectators to a hearing where pins or badges or uniforms does not mean they will allow it at the trial.
    • Refusing to give jurors transcript of expert testimony that they had already heard in order to review it and determine a verdict, thus expecting them to thoroughly remember every piece of information that they had heard over a 4 week period – this is the rule. The jury only gets documents that came in as exhibits (The reports were submitted as exhibits). And witness transcripts are never given to a jury. Those can take weeks or even months to generate by the stenographer.
    • Taking a week off during the middle of the trial – For 4th of July? Probably to avoid losing an entire jury pool that would have been unavailable.
    • Allowing one juror to hold the jury hostage by refusing to participate in deliberations, and sending them home early on Friday. – A juror refusing to deliberate in good faith can warrant a mistrial.

    I like your reporting, but sometimes you jump to conclusions that are completely wrong.

    1. This is all within the discretion of the Judge. What you’re saying is that it’s not out of bounds, but are these good calls?

  3. I remember Shawn D’amato crashed. I needed to make a name for myself so I went to see him at the hospital and I acted like I was concerned about him, and then BANG! I screwed him over to get ahead. And guess what, it worked!

  4. The maximum and minimum bets vary from one table to another.
    These events should happen once every 667 rolls and
    once every 1176 rolls respectively, yet both where seen within a handful of rolls from each other within the 150 rolls monitored.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *